answersLogoWhite

0

No, Rhode Island was not a type of joint stock colony. It was considered a type of royal colony because it was settled under a royal charter.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
More answers

No, Maryland was not a joint stock colony. Maryland as known as a proprietary colony in 1638, founded by Lord Baltimore.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

The Jamestown Colony was indeed a joint stock colony. It was established in 1607 by the Virginia Company which was a joint stock company as well.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Jamestown a joint stock colony?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp