answersLogoWhite

0

No, Rhode Island was not a type of joint stock colony. It was considered a type of royal colony because it was settled under a royal charter.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
More answers

No, Maryland was not a joint stock colony. Maryland as known as a proprietary colony in 1638, founded by Lord Baltimore.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

The Jamestown Colony was indeed a joint stock colony. It was established in 1607 by the Virginia Company which was a joint stock company as well.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Jamestown a joint stock colony?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp