He WAS. He created illegal taxes, imprisoned barons without reason or trial, and many more things that are terrible. However, after a revolt, he agreed to sign the Magna Carta. That is basically the rules of Canada today. he also did follow god so therefore the people of his time ( because they were really religous) didnt like him.
Bad. When his brother, King Richard I (the Lionhearted) was being held captive, John didn't bother to send the ransom money. Then, when Richard died and he became king outright, he was so obnoxious and money-grubbing that English nobles made him sign the famous document, the Magna Carta, which required him (and future monarchs) not to overstep their boundaries of power. Everything I've read about him shows him in a bad light, and if you don't believe me, then you should watch Disney's cartoon Robin Hood, which shows John as a silly, scheming, skinny lion of a king with a snake as an advisor!
King John was a bad king because he lost the english crown jewels in a swamp lost all their land in France. He was happy for a robber to kill a priest that was his enemy and was extremely cruel. He also could not fight.
He was a bad king but not a bad man. He couldn't fight wars very well but that doesn't mean he was a bad person. you wouldn't be mad at your friend for not winning a fight would you? No, exactly. Also King John quarreled with the pope. Again this shows that he is a bad KING not a bad PERSON.
I hope you find this useful.
IMPROVEMENT:
No, he was an awful King. He lost land in France, Killed family, made his noblemen outlaws, AND had over half the countries money in his Castle!
You could try Sellar and Yeateman's (sp?) "1066 and all that".
IMPROVEMENT: We do not know if King John was actually a bad king. He probably just made a lot of mistakes and the barons and monks wrote nasty things about him INCLUDING the story of Robin Hood
John was the leader of the Puritans.
John Smith is the leader who saved the Jamestown settlement from failure. By making everyone work in order to eat, he ensured that everyone was willing to pitch in for the common good.
The leader was John Winthrop.
The leader of the House of Representatives is the speaker of the house That is currently John Boehner
John Winthrop
no idea dis website give me no info!!
king Henry
King John was the worst king England ever had
he was a bad soldier because he was a bad leader and showed the path of the other people the wrong side .
he was the biggest idiot
well he was a great leader
William was a good king because he was well prepared and was a good leader.
because he poops good.
In many books in recent years, the info and discussions show that king john was a good leader in war, good at improvisation, good at thinking and good strategic. The monkish chronicles in 1206 state that he was a very bad but this information was biased as the monks didn't like him as he was mean to the pope and increased taxes. The portrayal of king John in robin hood shows his bad side which may or may not be true.
my friend it is king henry because king john is a good king in them days
That depends on your personal preferences for what makes a good leader. Some people like John Key, others do not.
John Adams was a mediocre leader. he didnt really do that much as a president