No, John Langdon was against a Bill of Rights. He believed everyone had been debating long enough, and it was time for action. He argued that the Constituion was clear already, but his arguments failed.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, because since his state (South Carolina) favored slavery and the rights that the "Bill Of Rights," state. So why would he and his state want to be against it? So my recently stated answer is, NO.
Jackie and lexi
John Langdon and Nicholas Gilman signed the US Constitution on behalf of New Hampshire.
John F. Kennedy
The Bill of rights was made after the Constiution was written, but with out it being added to the Constitution many people may have not voted for it to become the new governing document for the U.S because the Bill of rights protected their rights from a strong central government.