Best Answer

The Spoils System was first used by president Andrew Jackson. This system was pretty simple; when someone (ex: a senator) would run for an office position (ex: the presidency) and would win, he would use his new powers (as president) to give his big supporters positions (such as the presidential cabinet). This did two main things: it gave others incentive to also support that person, and it ensured that the person (president) was only surrounded by people who agreed with that person's viewpoints - thus, making it easy for the person (president) to accomplish his or her agenda (and pass or veto whatever bills he/she wanted to). Due to the use of this system, many new U.S Presidents were able to mold the country into the shape that he wanted much more easily; however, whether it was good or bad is more of a subjective (opinionated) question. It's up to you to decide that.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the spoils system good or bad for American politics?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about American Government

Why do you have politics?

Unimproved: People have no choice but to 'have politics'. Consider the notion of no politics in a nation such as the US. You must understand that politics does not refer to government. Politics is what the government debate. Politics is the economy, international relations, education, healthcare, marriage, housing, the law, war, everything. We have politics because the world we live in requires it. Political thought must have entered the world in a time where there was no control. People were doing whatever they pleased. I'm not saying politics is about control. It is about stability and a system that affects the lives of everybody. If we didn't have political parties debating over political issues we would never have a clear judgment of a situation. In theory, politicians are the people's employees. We need those people to ensure that our lives run smoothly. Without politics a person can come to your house, burgle it, kill whoever they pleased, walk a mile and do the same thing again, with no sanction or force to stop them. I hope this answer helps. That is a very philosophical question. Improved 10272010: "Father of politics after sex abuse is abuse of marital status as evidence of paternity to deny paternal duties to their babies as Equal Justice for All that is infecting all systems of Justice." Justice Autopsy (C). This is the real answer to the real question of man's choice to sell his evil system as his good system of Justice that makes people do whatever they please to do. If this improved answer fails to help people outlaw politics as hurt, KEKSI asks that people please reveal and correct the error to improve it to make it correct. Thanks. KEKSI. 09/15/2014 Politics is not the same as Law, and theoretically you don't need Politics to have a Lawful society. Under Law (English Common Law, American Common Law, Sharia Law, to name a few) crimes like theft, assault, and murder are still unlawful. Under Common Law there is the County Sheriff, and he and his deputies maintain the peace, apprehend suspected perpetrators, convene a jury court, and if the defendant is found guilty, he is sentenced. This all happens without Politics. Essential freedoms and protections exist under Law, without Politics. Marijuana would be lawful under Common Law. Politics on the other hand, in democracies, is basically the struggle of majority rule. Marijuana politics and gay marriage politics are good examples. Illegal yesterday, legal today in some areas, legal everywhere tomorrow (?) It's a constant struggle, with different factions trying to gain a political advantage. But the world of Law is comparatively stable and unchanging. Law can exist without Politics.

Are politics inherently bad?

The way politics,today plays out and the politicians behave, it seems that politics is inherently bad.But can the society not be worse without politics?Yes,it will be.Our civilisation has not yet evolved to a stage where policiations and politics can be discarted.Politicians are the necessary evil.Instead of discarding the science of politics,it has to be reformed.Political reform has to be brought about on the pattern of other reforms. Improvements in the political system need to be brought on two fronts.One by enacting laws and strengthening judicial system,and other by building up character of politicians.Of course,much headway has been achieved on legal reformation,but nothing concrete has been done on character-building.There has been constant deterioration in character of politicians over a period of time.Concentration of immense power at the hands of politicians,has made them autocratic.It gives them leeway to do whatever they want to do.Quite recently, growing cases of arbitrariness,corrupt practices,discriminatory treatments at the hands of those in political power has risen by leaps and bound giving bad name to politics and politics.What politicians lack badly today,is character, Character has to be built up.

The Mita system was a good government policy why or why not?

do you think the mita system was a good goverment policy why or wht not

Was the mita system a good government policy?


What is cryonyism?

Cronyism is a kind of favoritism where those with power appoint friends, or "cronies", to other positions of power. It is thus a system where success in politics depends much on who you know. In economics, crony capitalism is the same, where getting rich depends more on who you know than on being good at your job.

Related questions

Where can you find images about the spoils system?

It is a good thing to supplement learning with a physical picture. In order to find images of the spoils system, one can do an image search on a search engine, or they can search a library.

Why is the spoils system unconstitutional?

It was unconstitutional because spoiled milk actually tastes good

Is the spoils system unconstitutional?

It was unconstitutional because spoiled milk actually tastes good

What are some reasons for and against the spoils system?

4. Critical Thinking Analyzing Points of View What are reasons for and against the spoils system? For: The political backer might be good for the job. Against: The political backer might not be good for the job. Ps: Im on the same page as you

What is it called an elected official gives good jobs to his friends?

Nepotism is the term for what happens when an elected official gives good jobs to family members.

Did Jackson opposed the spoil system because it was undemocratic?

Jackson actually defended the spoils system on democratic grounds. He thought "Every man is as good as his neighbor, perhaps equally better"

Why do people see interest groups as both good and bad for American politics?

Because the want to

Is the spoils system a good idea in today's America?

No, the spoils system, which rewards political supporters with government positions, is not considered a good idea in today's America. It can lead to corruption, favoritism, and inefficiency in government operations. A merit-based system is generally seen as a more fair and effective way to fill government positions.

What is a good sentence for federalism?

Federalism is the system of the government. A good sentence would be, the politics of federalism in the United States are being changed.

A mistake anything which spoils something which is otherwise good?


Why should Jesse Jackson jr be on the African American stamp?

he does good things such as politics and tried to cut taxes(?)

What did not relate to the Era of Good Feelings?

adoption of the "American System."