I only know 3 differences if that will help. One difference is the dates. The Massachusetts Constitution was written in 1780. The U.S. Constitution was written in 1789. Also, in the Massachussetts Constitution, there are more key points than in the U.S. Constitution. And lastly, the Massachussetts Constitution was written specifically for the people of the United States and the U.S. Constitution was written for the people of the U.S.
The Length! The Colorado constitution can't be much different because it's a state in the US.
The main difference is that in the PA Constitution rights to Clean Air, water, and Natural resources are stated. Also, the Equal Rights Amendment for Women is a part of the PA constitution and still not part of the US Constitution.
The Wyoming constitution is created to govern the state of Wyoming while the US constitution deals with national issues. As such, state laws like those stipulated in the Wyoming constitution are only applicable where they don't conflict with the US constitution and not vice versa.
The first political parties were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists in the late 1700's. Anit-Federalists were against the ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they thought it gave too much power to the central, or federal, government. They opposed strong central government mainly due to fear of monarchy. They also opposed the Constitution at first because it did not outline the rights of the citizens. Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson held Anti-Federalist views. Federalists wanted a strong central government and they wanted the Constitution. Federalist leaders included Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. The feud between the two parties may have prevented the ratification of the Constitution had it not been for the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was eventually ratified after the promise of an addition of a Bill of Rights to appease the Anti-Feds. The Bill of Rights aroused out of the Massachusetts Compromise, where the state of Massachusetts agreed to ratify the Constitution if it was later amended to contain a Bill of Rights.
The framers of the US Constitution had their differences, but they also had some things they agreed on. Some of these were the need to allow the people to have a voice in how they were governed and to include a series of checks and balances in the system of government.
What are the differences between the united states constitution and the norway constitution?
What are the differences between the US Constitution and the confederacy of the Iroquois Nation?What are the differences between the US Constitution and the confederacy of the Iroquois Nation?
similarities between Jefferson and Jackson Both had slaves Differences:Federalist and Republican(strict vs loose construction of Constitution)
The US Constitution will cover the whole country. The Florida Constitution will only be applicable to those that live in the state.
The US Constitution will cover the whole country. The Florida Constitution will only be applicable to those that live in the state.
The U.S. and Florida constitutions both have a preamble (an introduction that states the purpose and goals of government), articles (sections that describe the powers and functions of the government), and amendments (changes that have been made to the constitution).
The various state constitutions resemble the US constitution in that they give rights and freedoms to the people in that state. The difference is that state constitutions are much more specific compared to the general US constitution. Also most state constitutions have been amended thousands of times, where as the US constitution has 27 amendments. Rights and Freedoms to citizens are the similarities More specific and more easily changed are the differences
The Length! The Colorado constitution can't be much different because it's a state in the US.
The US Constitution will cover the whole country. The Florida Constitution will only be applicable to those that live in the state.
One is Brit made, other is BD made
A main difference between the old and new Weimer constitutions is the way it addresses human rights. The older constitution made it possible to suspend human rights, which Hitler did.?æ The new constitution, however, makes sure human rights are maintained. There is also a difference in Separate members of the parliament can no longer be removed as they were in the earlier constitution.
hii this is my answer