# Private firms may decide to only offer profitable services. # Benefits of National Collective Action. # Ability to Equalize Resources # Weakens potential special interest control # Private firms may decide to only offer profitable services. # Benefits of National Collective Action. # Ability to Equalize Resources. # Weakens potential special interest control # If the business is owned by a foreigner, there is the danger. # The private sector may not have enough capital to invest in the business. The private sector also find it difficult to borrow loans from international organisation such as the World Bank or the International monetary fund
Your question implies that "nationalization is always better". It is not. Sometimes it is good, sometimes it is bad.
But first of all, we need to clarify the term nationalization. I suppose you use the word nationalization to describe changing ownership of a business from being owned by private to being owned by government.
In that term, nationalization good if the business objectives conflicts with the society/national objectives, if government can serves people better than the private do.
For example, if a telephone company, a private one, has monopoly on telecommunication. They could set the price so high because people depends to them. If they don't want to, they don't need to establish telephone line to small villages because there are no profits there. If that monopoly happens for some period of time, then government needs to do something about it. Government can take over the company, lowering the price, establish network to all houses in the country, etc.
hm. Technically communism can mean government ownership of all property, but in theory, the people are the government and everything is equal. That seems about right but you may want to look into it more
I like eggs.
Socialism
alagarchy
socialism is a government term referring to ideas or theories that support government ownership of ways of producing and distributing of of goods or merchandise
Why should a business weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each ownership option ?
No. The US government has a minority ownership in some, but not all banks. Most banks have no government ownership.
Advantages: self protection Disadvantages: accidentally kill people
government
Loose decision making
Socialist economy is characterized by more government ownership and central planning.
is the state ownership,also called public ownership,government ownership or state property.
Government of ownership of businesss
hm. Technically communism can mean government ownership of all property, but in theory, the people are the government and everything is equal. That seems about right but you may want to look into it more
The advantages and disadvantages of different forms of business ownership are of immense importance when it comes to choosing any one of them.
The advantages are the tax benefits and owning something. The disadvantage is that you have to keep up with all of the legal issues.
it was the government people