why the United States has only two major parties
Is this for ple.platoweb.com?If this is for ple.platobweb.comQuestion:The two major political parties in the United States are often accused of oversimplifying in the electoral system. Why would this be seen as a weakness of a two-party system?Answer: All of the aboveIt works. Trust me it doesyea it pretty much helps on plato
The disagreements and compromises finalizing the constitution were representation (The Great Compromise), slavery (Three-Fifths Compromise), and elections (Electoral College).
The single-member district electoral system is a significant factor as to why the American two-party system persists. The two major parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
Arguments for the Electoral College are that: - it contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. - it enhances the status of minority interests. - it contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system. - it maintains a federal system of government and representation. Arguments against the Electoral College are that: - it diminishes the principle of one vote per person, by giving the population of small states more electoral votes than an equivalent population in a large in a large state would receive - it can award victory to the candidate who wins the electoral but not the popular vote - a candidate who wins the electoral but not the popular vote may have a lasting problem of legitimacy as president. The indefensible reality is that more than 99% of campaign attention (ad spending and visits) was showered on voters in just ten states in 2012- and that in today's political climate, the swing states have become increasingly fewer and fixed. Where you live determines how much, if at all, your vote matters. The current state-by-state winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes (not mentioned in the US Constitution, but later enacted by 48 states), ensures that the candidates, after the conventions, will not reach out to about 80% of the states and their voters. Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or care about the voter concerns in the dozens of states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. It would only take winning a bare plurality of popular votes in just the 11 most populous states, containing 56% of the population of the United States, for a candidate to win the Presidency with a mere 23% of the nation's votes! This is somewhat obviated by the current political disagreements between some of these states.
none
none
A major flaw in the electoral college system is that a candidate could win the popular vote, but lose the election, due to the number of votes per state. This occurred between Bush and Gore.
True.
Some critics of the way the Electoral College performs its duty on using their votes to elect a US president has often come under fire. They believe that the national popular vote is the better way of doing this. They cite the current system flawed, but many others disagree.
data redundancy and data isolation
the first- past-the- post electoral system
the first past the post electoral system
the first-past-the-post electoral system
why the United States has only two major parties
The party leaders were the ones that chose the list of major-party candidates for president and vice-president. The candidates were then voted on by the electoral college.
strengths: the women Weaknesses: the men