It could be argued that Thoreauâ??s concept of a standing government should only be there as a consequence of the people allowing it to exist presupposes that all â??the peopleâ?? are comprised of those only capable of good intentions, whereas the government is not. Yet, we have seen the actions of some that can only be viewed as evil. If these bullies possess the personal power to push thru their evil intentions, are those of us lacking this ability not at the mercy of these efforts without a standing government to stop it?
It's judicial powers and its' standing army.
it did not guarantee basic rights
At this time, there are 20 standing committees in the United States House of Representatives. In addition, there is one select committee.
I agree with the federalists because they are supporting the government. On the other hand, why agree with people who are going against government matters? The federalists are sticking up for what is right and for what we need. That's a great way to repay them for standing by our side
Because England was bleeding them dry and they didn't have anyone in the English government standing up for them. England was taking all of their money and had no one in the government representing the colonists. No one was able to argue their side.
One argument could be that a standing government provides stability, protection, and infrastructure that are necessary for a functioning society. While individual freedom is important, a government also plays a crucial role in ensuring order and promoting the common good. Thoreau's objections may overlook the benefits that a well-functioning government can provide for its citizens.
The objections against a standing army often include concerns about unchecked power, potential tyranny, and the threat to civil liberties. Similarly, a standing government can be criticized for becoming entrenched and resistant to change, leading to bureaucratic inefficiencies and a disconnect from the populace. Both institutions may foster an environment where authority is centralized and dissent is stifled, raising questions about accountability and the protection of individual rights. Ultimately, the critiques highlight the need for oversight and adaptability in both military and governmental structures to safeguard democracy.
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
It is recommended in Hadith that water be drunk standing sitting but zam zam while standing . There are no arguments on orders given by Allah or Prophet Muhammad SAW .AnswerIt is recommended in shia Islam that water be drunk standing at day and sitting at nights.
The role the government should play in people's lives
unlimited because of the power of the leaders that were standing in the place of government
Democratic. With a long standing female Prime Minister.
Government backed financing is financing that has the promise of the government standing behind it. It is different from private investor financing or bank backed financing.
That the army is one part of the government
It's judicial powers and its' standing army.
To get a certificate of good standing in California one must go threw proper channels. Like an authorized government official. You must put in a written request and be in good standing.