There are a few choices depending on the circumstances. If by 'denies unalienable rights' you mean 'at gun/tank/nuke point' then the choice is either to suffer of sacrifice. Some believe it's actually their duty to overthrow an unjust Government by any means necessary. Others believe it's just their right to do so.
They might be able to call in the UN but I think that might be a bit of a toothless tiger...
unalienable rights
Are given to people by God- not by any government. As such, no government has the ability to take them away from you.
Yes, it does, since the US rebelled partially because they believed that the British Parliament didn't protect those rights.
We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. Contrary to popular belief, the Constitution does not grant rights to the people but expressly prohibits the government from interfering in certain unalienable rights that can only be given (and thus can only be taken) by our Creator. Many of the other papers and communications of the founding fathers also supports these beliefs and the Constitution was actually written to limit the powers of the federal government and not to grant rights to we the people.
it loses the right to govern so it cant govern anymore
According to the Declaration of Independence, people possess four unalienable rights: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and to change or abolish a destructive government and initiate a new government.
It provides a list of things that the Federal government is NOT allowed to do.
1) Human beings possess natural rights that cannot be legitimately given away or taken from by any government; 'unalienable rights'. These are rights ordained by the Creator. 2) Ordinary people create government to protect the above mentioned rights. 3) If the government fails to protect those unalienable/natural rights, the people themselves can withdraw their consent of that government and create a new one.
unalienable rights
According to the Declaration of Independence, governments are established to secure the rights of mankind, such as the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These rights, according to the Declaration, are unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away. When any form of government becomes "destructive of these ends" (the unalienable rights of the citizens), it is the right of the citizens to "alter or abolish" that government, and establish a new government that will protect the rights of the people.
Are given to people by God- not by any government. As such, no government has the ability to take them away from you.
The assertion that certain rights are inalienable means that no person, government, or authority of any kind has the right to deprive people of those rights.
According to Thomas Jefferson, the rights that the government cannot take away are called "unalienable rights." These rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson believed that these rights are inherent to all individuals and should be protected by the government.
Yes, it does, since the US rebelled partially because they believed that the British Parliament didn't protect those rights.
He believed that all individuals are born with certain rights and privilages that should be protected.
"Every individual is born with certain unalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, that cannot be taken away or granted by any government."
unalienable rights