conclusion of directive principles of state policy
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.
Policy is a noun and therefore cannot have a "past tense". Policy is a derivation of political management and could potentially be associated with the verb "to police", though the connotations in English tend to differ.
An ordinance is a law. They can be created at the local level, state level, or federal level. They set the rules of a specific situation.
A desire for noninvolvement.
The excise tax. Both he and his Jeffersonian followers could not stand it.
A policy is a set of rules that is followed within a company. A directive is a rule that a company may make to correct a part of the policy that is not being followed properly. This could include disciplinary actions taken when policies are not being followed.
The term "41 article" could refer to different contexts depending on the subject matter. In legal terms, it often pertains to specific articles within constitutions or legal documents, such as Article 41 of the Indian Constitution, which relates to the directive principles of state policy. In different contexts, it could also refer to various articles in treaties or international agreements. Please provide more context for a precise answer.
The U.S. defeat in Vietnam was considered a failure for the policy of containment. (if your doing study island "Korean and Vietnam war)
A synonym for controlling statement could be directive or command.
A scientific term for "conclusion" could be "findings" or "results".
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.
No its not a conclusion for a debate but you could ask politics about it.
He could not draw a conclusion on the basis of conversation. This is an example using the phrase draw a conclusion.
By observing and analyzing information give to us we infer or conclude an outcome. It's an inference.
nothing i want this answer
For an ending, the word could be "summation". For a logical determination, the word could be "deduction" or "inference".
You have been waiting for an answer on this for a while. I decided I would try to answer you. I researched where I could and near as I understand the L85 directive in World War 2 in the United States was a directive that said people had to ration their clothing and cloth purchases because the US needed the fabric from the mills for making uniforms, packs, etc. Nylons were donated to make coverings for powder magazines for the big guns and other things. There was also a leather and rubber ration put into place with that directive so the service men could have boots and other leather products. I found an article in encyclopedia com but it was only half an article.