answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

a journal written by a civil war soldier describing a major battle

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

A picture, a letter, a uniform, a bullet, a diary, a battlefield, military reports, graves, are all primary sources.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What could serve as a primary source for a historian studying the American civil war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why would a historian use primary source when studying about a historical event?

Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event


Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?

Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event


What is a primary sourses?

A primary source is something that comes from the time that the history is studying. If a historian is studying the first world war, then letters and diaries writen by soldiers, the uniforms they wore and the weapons that they used are primary sources. If a soldier who fought in the trenches wrote about his memories of the war a long time after the war had finished, it would stil be a primary source.


How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event. and ldquoApex and?

It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.


What item could serve as a primary source for a historian studying the end of apartheid in South Africa?

A journal written by a black south African describing his experiences with apartheid polices -Apex


Would a story about Persian wars still be a primary source if it were written by a historian?

No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.


Is a historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain a primary or secondary source and why?

A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.


Would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?

Primary source


What would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?

Primary source


What does a historian ask himself to decide if a primary source is usable or not for his research?

A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?


A historian want to know How the Gulf was Fought which is an appropriate way to use primary sources to answer this question?

An historian wants to know how the gulf war was fought.what is the appropriate way to use primary source?


What is an example of a primary source that a historian might use to study the colonial era?

What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use