Best Answer

This quote comes from Justice Harlan's eloquent majority opinion in the famous case of Cohen v. California, 403 US 15 (1971), which you may remember as the case involving the California man who wore a jacket reading "F*ck the Draft."

Cohen is a relatively short decision in an even shorter series of cases dealing with the elusive "fighting words" doctrine. While the First Amendment may protect most of our speech, there are certain forms of speech it does not protect, in this case, "abusive epitaphs which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction." Cohen.

Cohen, however, sets the bar for the determination of fighting words very high. Despite Cohen's rather provocative attire, the Court found it entirely outside of California's right to restrict his wearing it. The Court lists numerous rationals for why Cohen's conduct did not rise to the level of unprotected speech, including the observation that the public could easily avert their eyes from the patch, that Cohen wore the jacket to a courthouse (this seems counter-intuitive as a reasoning at first blush, but consider that the Court is particularly concerned not with what a person does in public, but with what a captive audience is forced to endure in the quiet of their own home and it makes more sense), and, finally, that to enact a ban on one of our beloved four letter words would affect much, much more than the intended speech. Specifically, such a ban could well work its way into affecting artistic choice.

Since Cohen, the Supreme Court has never upheld a "fighting words" statute. Before Cohen only they only upheld such a conviction in Chaplinsky (Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire, 315 US 568 (1942)). Although Chaplinksy was never officially overruled by Cohen, the assumption is that the Court realized the error of its former ways and Chaplinsky is no longer good law, as far as its holding.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Justice M. Harlan II mean when he said 'One man's vulgarity is another man's lyric'?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

'One man's vulgarity is another man's lyric' mean?

This quote suggests that what one person might consider vulgar or offensive, another person might interpret as artistic or expressive. It highlights the subjective nature of taste and perception in art and language.

What is another way to spell lyric?


What does elegy mean in sub- genre of lyric poetry?

It is another type of lyric poem as you stated. It is a poem that is about death or sadness!

What age did Victoria Justice sing the thousand miles?

No Venessa Carlton sings that song. Somebody just make a lyric video of her singing it.

What is the kind of voice angeline quinto has?

She is a Lyric-Coloratura Soprano.

What has the author Jacob Harsen Purdy written?

Jacob Harsen Purdy is known for writing non-fiction books that focus on topics such as personal development, self-improvement, and entrepreneurship. Some of his popular works include "The Art of Accomplishment" and "The Journey of Success."

What actors and actresses appeared in Five Dollars - 2013?

The cast of Five Dollars - 2013 includes: Lyric Justice as Anthony Parveen Kaur as Natalie Tika Simone as Mother

The sonnet belongs to which family of poetry?

The sonnet belongs to the family of lyric poetry. It is a 14-line poem with a specific rhyme scheme and meter, traditionally expressing feelings, emotions, or thoughts.

What is the purpose of a lyric?

A lyric poem expresses the authors mood.

How tall is Lyric Amore?

Lyric Amore is 170 cm.

Jada Pinkett Smith starred in Jasons?


Can lyric poetry be about anything?

yes,lyric poetry can be about anything.