Miller v. California, 413 US 15 (1973)
That the distribution of obscene material through the mail is not protected by the First Amendment.
The Court also held that both state and federal obscenity standards in use at the time of the case were vague and overbroad. While the Court upheld Miller's conviction, it also invalidated the "community standards" tests and the Court's own test, established in Roth v. US, 354 US 476 (1957) and replaced them with a three-prong test (called the Miller Test) designed to result in more consistency and less subjectivity in judging allegedly obscene materials.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Supreme court justices decide if laws are constitutional.
Chief Justice Warren Burger
The supreme court declared that gerrymandering was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th amendment.
Currently, the California State Supreme Court is considered most influential.
That trusts were legal in other countries
Miller v. California, 413 US 15 (1973)Marvin Miller
Supreme court justices decide if laws are constitutional.
Supreme Court of California was created in 1849.
The case is pending before the California Supreme Court as they granted review by a six-o vote to review the California Court Appeal Opinion in that case. The California Supreme Court set oral arguments in the case for April 7, 2009 in Los Angeles, California in this case
Chief Justice Warren Burger
Supreme Court
When a law is passed the Supreme Court can decide if it is constitutional.
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
According to the California Supreme Court Historical Society, the California Supreme Court has been the "most cited and followed" state supreme court since 1940.
Typically, a majority of at least five out of the nine Supreme Court justices is needed to decide a case.
No
The supreme court declared that gerrymandering was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th amendment.