0
What does pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism mean?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
The term "pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism" is an argument against socialism. It means to have people under complete government control will make them need to do nothing, want nothing, and seek nothing.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Lol Tbh
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What line from the Decleration of Independence does Nicolas Cage quote in National Treasure?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpation's, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.
What sentence from the Declaration of Independence best develops the idea that people have a right to revolt against a tyrannical authority?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them to absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
When tyranny becomes law resistance becomes duty?
Yes, I don't know what country you live in, but in the Declaration of Independence it states: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
What according to Jefferson are people obligated to do in the face of despotism?
According to the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson among others, it is the citizen's civic duty to "alter or abolish" any oppressive form of government. Despite his historical standing as a revolutionary hero, as a lawyer and diplomat he was probably referring to political action and not violence.
What is a critical rule for determining whether something is a public good?
Read the preamble to the Constitution. More particularly, read the Declaration of Independence. I quote two entries: "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
What line from the Decleration of Independence does Nicolas Cage quote in National Treasure?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpation's, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.
What can be done when any government kills its own people?
US Declaration of Independence "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security"
What sentence from the Declaration of Independence best develops the idea that people have a right to revolt against a tyrannical authority?
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them to absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
When tyranny becomes law resistance becomes duty?
Yes, I don't know what country you live in, but in the Declaration of Independence it states: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
What supported the right to rebel if a government failed to protect natural rights?
I think you may be thinking of Thomas Jefferson, who wrote this in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. ..."But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."... Thomas Jefferson
What according to Jefferson are people obligated to do in the face of despotism?
According to the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson among others, it is the citizen's civic duty to "alter or abolish" any oppressive form of government. Despite his historical standing as a revolutionary hero, as a lawyer and diplomat he was probably referring to political action and not violence.
When should a bystander decide whether to help at an emergency?
But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. It means that those who have the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action. -Benjamin Gates (National Treasure) If you are equipped and someone isn't getting necessary help, you are automatically given responsibility by your knowledge of the crisis.
Is a critical rule for determining whether something is a public good?
Read the preamble to the Constitution. More particularly, read the Declaration of Independence. I quote two entries: "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
What is a critical rule for determining whether something is a public good?
Read the preamble to the Constitution. More particularly, read the Declaration of Independence. I quote two entries: "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
when is it acceptable to change your goverment?
Look at the Constitution. It says it here: We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are … endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…. That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Declaration of Independence (1776).
Who can remove the persident from his office?
Anyone can, it is stated in the declaration and I quote: That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Which truths in the second paragraph of the declaration of indepence are self-evident?
that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
