Wiki User
∙ 2016-10-04 14:24:18A majority opinion explains the reasoning behind the courts ruling while a dissenting opinion explains a disagreement with the courts ruling
Anonymous
Alexis Pack
Trey Dillon
A majority opinion presents the official reasoning behind the courts ruling while a concurring opinion offers different reasoning.
A majority opinion presents the official reasoning behind the courts ruling while a concurring opinion offers different reasoning.
A concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it.
A concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it.
To dissent; if the justices disagree with the majority opinion, they write a dissenting opinion.
dissenting.
A majority opinion presents the official reasoning behind the courts ruling while a concurring opinion offers different reasoning.
A concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it.
A concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it.
A concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the outcome reached by the majority, but who came to that conclusion in a different way and wants to write about why. A dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagreed with the majority and wants his disagreement known and explained
dissenting, esp. from the opinion of the majority.
To differ in opinion, especially with the majority
Majority, Concurring, Dissenting, and Per Curiam
dissenting.
To dissent; if the justices disagree with the majority opinion, they write a dissenting opinion.
A dissenting opinion.
A dissenting opinion is written when a justice disagrees with the majority opinion (which carries the force of law). If a justice is writing a dissenting opinion, that means he or she voted with the minority group, and wants to explain the reason why he or she disagrees with the official Opinion of the Court. Dissenting opinions may be cited, but are not enforceable.
dissenting.