The explanation for the US Supreme Court's decision is called the opinion.
The Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison, issued in 1803, established this principle by ruling a section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional
per curiam
per curiam opinion.
Yes especially when a Superior Court had issued on the case and made it a precedent then should the inferior court must abide by it.
Yes it can. But as far as it being a slam dunk for the same judgment to be issued, no. Whoever is doing the suing can only use the decision to support their position and maybe buttress their position to influence the decision handed there in the civil court.
The US Supreme Court decision is called the "opinion of the Court," which most often refers to the majority opinion (decision signed by the most justices) on a case. Sometimes, however, the "official decision" may be a "per curiam" ruling (issued unsigned) or a "plurality" (an opinion, often concurring in judgment, endorsed by more justices than the formal "opinion of the Court.").For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The explanation for the US Supreme Court's decision is called the opinion.
Verdict (typically refers to a jury decision) or judgment(final decision of the court).
They are known as the APPELLANT.
A court decree is a court decision made by a judge and made public. This is an official decision that no one can overturn.
The decision of the jury is called a verdict. The decision of a judge is called her ruling or holding.
Opinion of the court.
In the Supreme Court, the written decision and legal reasoning for a case is called an Opinion.
The agreed ruling of more than half of the Supreme Court justices is called a majority decision.
The written legal reasoning behind a court's decision is called an opinion.
.... is called a VERDICT (verdicts are rendered by a jury); court decisions are typically called judgements.