a political history is a party when all the governments come together and its history because its from long ago.
political science
The democratic political party has controlled the US Senate for the most total years throughout history.
democrates and republics
History and politics are very closely related. Political parties always have their roots in history. The governement is only understood through understanding history. Politics alter the course of history for each country and the world at large.
U.S. history is just that... history. You learn about U.S. history in U.s. history. American gov. is more about learning about the American legal and political systems. There should be some history in that class but it's more politics-oriented.
Samuel Bernstein has written: 'Essays in political and intellectual history' 'French political and intellectual history' -- subject(s): History
B. A. Haddock has written: 'A history of political thought' -- subject(s): History, Political science 'Vico's political thought' -- subject(s): Political and social views
A keynote address often glorifies the history and leaders of a political party.
== ==
A keynote address is something which addresses the history of a political party. It also usually glorifies the leaders and programs of that political party.
Relation between political science and history:-the relation between political science and history is very close.It has been put by sir,John Seeley in this couplet.'History without political science has no fruit''Political science without history has no root'1)History essential for political science:-History is a record of past events.It provides raw material to political science.political science tells us not only what the state is but also what it has been.The study of the state as it has been can be done only with the help of history.Historical study is essential for understanding political thoughts,movements and institutions history is a vast store house of facts and information as from which political science abtains data for its generalisation.2)Political science essential for history:-history has also much to borrow from political science. our knowledge of history is meaningless if the political bearings of events and movements are adequately appreciated.e.g.The history of the nineteenth century Europe cannot be fully understood withoutbringing out the significance of movement like nationalism,imperialism,individualism and socialism.3)Difference between the two:-all this does not mean that history and political science are one and the same.There are fundamental difference between the two. History is a record of past events and movements which embraces wars,revolution,military compaign,economic,political,social and religious upheavals.All this matirial is not required for purposes of political science. The main concern of the student of political science is to study the evolution of political institutions and other facts which bear directly or indirectly on the state.Political science thus selects facts out of history.Conclusion:-Our conclusion is that political science and history,though they are different subjects yet they touch each other on many points.
Duncan Kelly has written: 'The state of the political' -- subject(s): History, Political science 'The propriety of liberty' -- subject(s): Liberty, Political science, History
bwisit
quid_e_azam
what is the relationship b/w political sceince and history
Malcolm Pearce has written: 'British political history, 1867-1995' -- subject(s): Politics and government, History 'British political history, 1867-1990' -- subject(s): History
The relationship/concerns between political theory and history are very close. The two are complementary to each other. The intimacy between political theory and history is brought tout in the following couplet of Seeley, an eminent English Historian, who wrote - 'History without Political Science has not fruit, Political Science without History has no root.' The affinity between history and political science is so close that Freedom goes to the extent of saying that 'history is past politics and politics is present history.' History not merely records events but analyses causes and points out tendencies. It overlaps political theory. Political theory, however, goes further. It uses historical facts to discover general laws and principles; it selects, analyses and systematizes the facts of history in order to extract the permanent principles of political life. Political theory, further, is teleological, that is to say, it deals with the state as it ought to be; whereas, history deals with what it has been.' The political scientist goes back to the past in order to explore the future. 'So conceived history', writes Burns, an English philosopher, 'will be made something more than the luxury of a scholar. It will be the inspiration of honest politician; it will be the real basis for criticism of the present and modification of the future'.