0
It is in article I section 8 paragraph 18:
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested in the government of the United States or in any department or office thereof."
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How was John Marshall's interpretation of constitution differ from Thomas Jefferson's?
John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.
HOW WAS JOHN MARSHALS INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION DIFFERENT FROM THOMAS JEFFERSONS?
John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.
How might Abraham Lincolns victory in the election of 1860 lead to future problems?
Many people in the north wanted no part of slavery anywhere in the country. Southerners wanted slavery because they thought it helped production of crops etc. There are contrasting beliefs. Abraham Lincoln was from the North and a proponent of Federal rights and powers to limit slavery. The southern states wanted strong state powers and rights and weaker federal powers and rights. Slavery was a States Right issue and the federal government should not interfere. The northern states wanted the exact opposite, strong federal powers and rights and weaker state powers and rights. The right of the Federal government to abolish Slavery should trump any so-called States Rights. So the southern states voted to secede from or leave the United States also know as the Union. The US Civil War was thus started.
Can anyone other than the Chief Justice of the United States administer the Oath of Office to the President?
Yes. The Constitution states the exact wording to be used in the oath but does not specify that it must be done by the Chief Justice. Anyone authorized by law to administer an oath within the jurisdiction in which the oath is taken may administer the oath to the President. When Lyndon Johnson was sworn in after the Kennedy assasination the oath was administered by a justice of the peace aboard Air Force One.
The exact place of a city boundary ect?
latitude
What clause article 1 section 8 clause 18 allows congress to do what is necessary and proper?
The answer is in the question. The Necessary and Proper Clause is Article I, Section 8, Clause 18. The exact wording is: The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
What is a strict interpretation of the Elastic Clause?
The exact text of the Elastic Clause (also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause) is: "The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." Therefore, a strict interpretation of the Elastic Clause would mean that Congress could pass any laws out of their list of enumerated powers.
Does wording have to be exact trademark wording to be illegal?
No, wording does not have to be exactly the same as a trademark to be illegal. If the wording is similar enough to cause confusion among consumers and to dilute the distinctive quality of the trademark, it could still be considered a trademark infringement. It's best to consult with a legal professional for specific advice regarding trademark issues.
What are the exact words on the Bill of Rights?
You can read the Bill of Rights' exact wording at the link below.
What are alternates on WikiAnswers?
"Alternates" or "alternate wordings" are other ways of phrasing the same exact question on WikiAnswers. When an alternate wording is asked on the site, it redirects you to the primary wording of that question. If an alternate wording is mismatched with a primary wording from which it differs, we should "split" it out into a separate question.
What do quotations do in internet searches?
They narrow down your search to the exact wording typed within the quotes.
What exactly is the wording of the law which prohibits parents for not enrolling their kids in school?
Because laws are written differently in each state, the exact wording of the law which prohibits parents from not enrollin their kids in school will differ from location to location. When looking for the exact wordiing, it's best to remember the state one lives in to find the exact law in question.
How many people asked this question?
No one has asked that question yet. That question is the only one of its kind so far, and no exact replica has been made of that exact question, exact wording and everything.
Why isn't the exact question you ask on this site?
If a question is not on the site, no one asked it yet, or they did not use the exact wording you used. Just ask your question in the box at the top.
What is a fixed-formula prayer?
It is a prayer that has an exact, unchanging wording (as opposed to something informal, personal or spur-of-the-moment).
What is fixed formula prayer?
It is a prayer that has an exact, unchanging wording (as opposed to something informal, personal or spur-of-the-moment).
What is a fixed formula prayer?
A fixed formula prayer is a prayer that has a set structure and wording that is repeated verbatim. Examples include the Lord's Prayer in Christianity or the Salat (prayer) in Islam. These prayers provide a framework for worshipers to express their beliefs and connect with the divine.
