The Rule of Four has nothing to do with arguing before the US Supreme Court. It refers to the number of US Supreme Court justices who must agree to hear a case before the case can be accepted on appeal. If four justices sign off on a petition for writ of certiorari (request for review), the case will be added to the Court's docket.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The US Supreme Court determines whether to hear a case according to the Rule of Four. If at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agree, they will grant certiorari and hear the case.
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
supreme court
The Rule of Four. At least four justices must vote to grant certiorari (review the case) for it to be heard.
Decisions of the US Supreme Court affect the rulings and procedures of EVERY other court in the country, right down to the municipal level.
The US Supreme Court determines whether to hear a case according to the Rule of Four. If at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agree, they will grant certiorari and hear the case.
The Rule of Four means four of the nine justices must agree to hear a case in order for it to be accepted on appeal. If four or more justices think the case is worth the Court's time, then the Supreme Court will issue a writ of certiorari to the lower court ordering them to send the case files to the Supreme Court, and the case will be placed on the docket.
(Supreme Court)
No
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
The US Supreme Court determines whether to hear a case according to the Rule of Four. If at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agree, they will grant certiorari and hear the case.
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
supreme court
The decision then remains what it was when appealed to the Supreme Court.
In 1977 the Supreme Court set a deadline for the restoration of civilian rule. Then in 1978 the Supreme Court upheld the death sentence for Prime Minister Zulifikar Ali Bhutto.
The supreme's court overturned Miranda conviction in a 5 to 4 decision.
It established the authority of the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of an act of Congress. That is, it resolved that the Supreme Court is the final authority when determining whether a law is Constitutional or not.