Marbury v. Madison, 1803
1. The Marbury v. Madison case established
the right of the Supreme Court to rule on
the constitutionality of laws.
2. It provided a way to check the powers
of Congress and the president, and thus
more effectively balanced the powers of all
three branches of the federal government.
3. On the one hand,Marshall declared the
Judiciary Act unconstitutional because the
power for Congress to pass such an act
was not mentioned in the Constitution. Yet
at the same time he believed the Supreme
Court had the power to declare a law
unconstitutional, even though this power
was not specifically mentioned in the
Constitution.
4. Answers will vary. Students who favor
the Court's power may say that it provides
a check on Congress and more equally
balances the power of the three branches
of government. Students who oppose
the Court's power may say that since
Congressional representatives are elected,
they represent the will of the people, so
the laws passed by Congress should stand
and not be subjected to a review by a
Court of appointed judges.
5. Answers will vary. Students who think the
influence of personal politics on Court
rulings is improper may say that legal opinions
should be based on a legal interpretation
of the Constitution law and not on
politics. Students who accept political
influence on Court rulings as proper may
say that it often reflects the will of the
majority.
CASE
You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework. Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills skills and not our answers.
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
chapman won the supreme court case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
To provide a specific answer regarding "Supreme Court case study 4," I would need more details about the case in question, as the designation of "case study 4" is not universally recognized. Each Supreme Court case has its own unique context, issues, and rulings. If you can provide the name or details of the specific case you're referring to, I can summarize the key points or outcomes related to it.
The Supreme Court Case Study 32 likely refers to a specific case or a compilation of cases analyzed for educational purposes. However, without more context, it's difficult to pinpoint which case is being referenced, as there are numerous significant Supreme Court cases that could fit into a study framework. Generally, such case studies examine the legal principles, constitutional issues, and implications of the decisions made by the Court. If you have a specific case in mind or further details, please provide them for a more accurate response.
You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework. Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills skills and not our answers.
Case Study 29 refers to a specific Supreme Court case, but without additional context, it's unclear which case is being referred to, as there are numerous cases numbered and categorized in various studies or legal texts. Generally, Supreme Court case studies analyze significant rulings, their implications, and their impact on law and society. If you have a particular case in mind or need details on a specific ruling, please provide more information for a precise answer.
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
What reason did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
chapman won the supreme court case
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
Yes, you can appeal to the Supreme Court in this case if you believe there was a legal error in the lower court's decision.
power to determine whether a law is constitutional (study island)