0
What items in the list are secondary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred in Egypt in 2011?
II and III apex :)
What else can I help you with?
What items in the list of secondary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred Egypt in 2011?
ll and lll
Why did the authors of the congress of the constitution want to avoid political parties?
Washington stated that political parties would take over the political process and the common good of the nation would be secondary .The party would only be concerned with it's survival. I think he was right when you look at the political parties today
Is Washington's letter a primary or secondary source?
secondary
Is an encyclopedia a primary source?
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Is bias a secondary source?
Bias is not a secondary source. In terms of historical and academic research and writing, secondary sources are articles and books written by historians and other academics. Secondary sources can be biased based on when the source was written and the author.Ê
What items in the list of secondary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred Egypt in 2011?
ll and lll
Which would be a secondary source of information about the industrial revolution?
A secondary source of information about the Industrial Revolution could be a scholarly book or article that analyzes and interprets primary sources from that period, such as factory records or personal letters. For example, a historical analysis discussing the social and economic impacts of the Industrial Revolution, written by a historian, would be considered a secondary source. Additionally, documentaries or educational websites that summarize the events and consequences of the Industrial Revolution also qualify as secondary sources.
What should a historian remember about using secondary sources?
When using secondary sources, a historian should critically evaluate the credibility and perspective of the author, considering their background and potential biases. It's essential to contextualize the information within the broader historiography and recognize how interpretations can vary over time. Additionally, historians should corroborate secondary sources with primary evidence whenever possible to ensure a well-rounded understanding of the topic. Lastly, being aware of the publication date is important, as newer research may offer updated insights or challenge previous conclusions.
How would you describe the action of Historian B?
To accurately describe the action of Historian B, I would need more context regarding their specific actions or contributions. Generally, historians analyze, interpret, and contextualize historical events, often utilizing primary and secondary sources to construct narratives. If Historian B undertook a particular study or published a work, their action could be characterized as contributing to the understanding of a specific historical period or theme. Please provide more details for a tailored response.
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
What does a historian require in order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event?
A historian requires a thorough examination of primary and secondary sources, ensuring the credibility and context of the evidence. Critical analysis of different perspectives and the consideration of biases in the sources are essential for a balanced interpretation. Additionally, understanding the socio-political context of the time period helps the historian make a more nuanced and valid interpretation of the event.
A historian is interested in studying the role of women during the Industrial Revolution. He finds a recently published secondary source that includes the information in the box below. Which of the fo?
Understanding the historical context of a 19th-century women's rights poster. apex
Is a historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain a primary or secondary source and why?
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
What situations would a historian most likely need to use secondary sources?
When researching recent theories about the Cold War.
A person who studies people from the past?
A person who studies people from the past is called a historian. Historians analyze primary and secondary sources to understand and interpret past events, societies, and cultures. They may specialize in a particular time period or region.
What two main types of sources does a historian use?
A historian uses primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time under study, to gain a direct understanding of historical events. They also use secondary sources, such as books or articles written by other scholars, which interpret and analyze primary sources to provide context and a broader understanding of the historical period.
