0
Depends on the fact. This question can not be answered since the subject is not given.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Fran
Beau
TaigaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How are interpretations different from facts?
Facts speak to what occurred, whereas interpretations speak to the meaning of what occurred.
Which interpretation might this excerpt support?
Answer this question… Europeans thought the Japanese were superior to the Chinese.
Why shouldn't the USSC be able to substitute its own factual determinations for those of a jury in a lower court?
The Supreme Court has a very specific function, which is to interpret the US Constitution and its application to specific cases. Determination of facts is a specific function of juries. Therefore, the Supreme Court will respect the determination of facts made by a jury, and will limit itself to interpretation of relevant constitutional issues.
What is narrow interpretation?
narrow interpretation is the in between interpretation of the judges of the supreme court. In a narrow interpretation the judges fallow what is on the constitution but also their ideas.
How would the United States be different if Washington had agreed with Madison and Jefferson's interpretation of the constitution?
Laws would have been stricter if Washington had listened to Madison and Jefferson's interpretation of the constitution. - opinion
