A state could ignore the Nineteenth Amendment and pass a law forbidding women to
The supremacy clause gave the federal government the ability to override the states bill of rights.
The founding fathers knew that they would not be ready for everything, so therefore they made a clause for which they could bend the rules a little bit.
the elastic clause was created so the government could make things that the constition did'nt allow. like the air force.
The framers could predict the laws that Congress may need to carry out their powers in the future. They created the 'necessary and proper clause' so that Congress could enact laws they need to effectuate their powers.
the elastic clause
The supremacy clause gave the federal government the ability to override the states bill of rights.
The answer is the "Supremacy Clause". This is also the answer to the test. (:
One of the earliest examples of the Supreme Court ruling that a state law violated the constitution under the Supremacy Clause came in the landmark McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), wherein the court ruled that the state of Maryland could not tax the Second Bank of the United States, establishing the principle that the states could not tax the federal government. taken directly from http://www.answers.com/topic/supremacy-clause
The Supreme Court used the Supremacy Clause to rule that the State of Maryland could not tax the Second Bank of the United States because it violated federal authority. The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law when there is a conflict. In this case, the Court determined that allowing Maryland to impose a tax on the federal bank would undermine the federal government's ability to operate effectively. This ruling reinforced the principle of federal supremacy and limited state interference with federal institutions.
Marshall could draw upon the Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law. He might also reference the Necessary and Proper Clause in Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the authority to enact laws deemed necessary to execute its powers, thereby supporting a broader interpretation of federal authority. These clauses bolster the argument for federal supremacy in matters of national importance.
White Supremacy
In 1819, the Supreme Court ruled in McCulloch v. Maryland that the State of Maryland could not tax the Second Bank of the United States. The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, used the Supremacy Clause to assert that federal laws and institutions take precedence over state laws. This ruling reinforced the principle of federal supremacy and affirmed the constitutionality of the bank, emphasizing the ability of Congress to use implied powers to carry out its enumerated responsibilities.
main clause; subordinate clause
The Anti-Federalists were particularly concerned about the Supremacy Clause in Article VI, Section 2, which asserts that federal laws take precedence over state laws. They feared that this clause could allow the federal government to override state protections, including those outlined in a potential Bill of Rights. They worried that without explicit protections, the federal government could infringe upon individual liberties and rights. This concern contributed to their demand for a Bill of Rights to safeguard personal freedoms.
Its Main cause; Subordinate Clause- Just got it right for apexx
The correct punctuation for "which" would depend on its usage in a sentence. It could be followed by a comma if introducing a nonrestrictive clause or used without punctuation for a restrictive clause.
The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, establishes that federal law takes precedence over state laws when there is a conflict between the two. This means that if a state law contradicts a federal law, the federal law will prevail, helping to maintain a uniform legal framework across the country. As a result, the Supremacy Clause plays a crucial role in resolving disputes between states or between states and the national government by ensuring that federal authority is upheld in matters of conflicting legislation. This provision helps to prevent a patchwork of state laws that could undermine national policies and regulations.