Tinker et al. V. Des Moines Independent Community School District, et al., 1969
Tinker and several students were suspended for wearing black arm bands in protest of the Vietnam War. The school argues that it had an interest in limiting free speech to preserve the peace at school because the arm bands could provoke retaliation.
The Supreme Court didn't buy the argument noting specifically that the protest was peaceful and passive, and that the threat of some theoretical disturbance was insufficient grounds to suspend the First Amendment, noting that virtually any spoken word in class might provoke or offend someone. The court ruled that "in our system, state operated schools may not be the enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students"
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
The 4th, 5th, and the 14th as well as the Miranda decision by the Supreme Court.
None.
The Supreme Court prohibited racial gerrymandering in 1993, holding that the practice violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
The supreme court declared that gerrymandering was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th amendment.
The Supreme Court found in favor of the students in the Tinker case because it upheld their First Amendment right to free speech, ruling that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court determined that the students' wearing of black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was a form of symbolic speech that did not disrupt school activities. This landmark decision emphasized the importance of protecting free expression, even in a school setting.
High school students have First Amendment rights because the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that free speech and expression are fundamental rights that extend to minors in educational settings. Landmark cases, such as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, established that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." However, these rights can be limited if the speech disrupts the educational process or infringes on the rights of others. Thus, while students enjoy First Amendment protections, they are balanced against the school's responsibility to maintain a conducive learning environment.
In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district implemented a policy to prohibit these armbands, leading to the suspension of several students. The case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that the students' First Amendment rights were violated, emphasizing that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Thus, the events unfolded from the students' protest, school policy enforcement, and ultimately, the Supreme Court's decision.
The Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) affirmed students' rights to free speech in public schools, ruling that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." The case involved students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, which the Court found did not disrupt the educational process. This landmark ruling established that student expression is protected under the First Amendment, as long as it does not interfere with the operation of the school.
The statement "Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate" is significant because it underscores the principle that students retain their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression even while in a school environment. This notion was established in the landmark Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which affirmed that students can express their views as long as it does not disrupt the educational process. Recognizing these rights is crucial for fostering a culture of open dialogue and critical thinking within educational settings.
There is no thu amendment.
ninth amendment
The Tinker v. Des Moines case was important because it affirmed students' First Amendment rights in public schools. In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This landmark decision established that school authorities cannot censor student expression unless it disrupts the educational process, thus setting a precedent for student activism and free speech in educational settings.
In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court stated, "Students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This statement underscores the principle that students retain their First Amendment rights while at school, reinforcing the notion that their conduct, as long as it does not disrupt the educational environment, is protected. The ruling affirmed that expression, even in a school setting, is a fundamental aspect of individual rights.
14th Amendment
Polygamy is not in any amendment, it was outlawed by a Supreme Court decision.
The final outcome of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District was that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students, affirming their right to free speech under the First Amendment. The Court determined that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This landmark decision established that schools could not censor student expression unless it caused a substantial disruption to the educational process.