0
Wesberry v. Sanders, (1964) required that Districts of the US House of Representatives be composed of approximately equal populations in order to ensure fair representation of US citizens. Wesberry was one of a pair of cases decided in 1964 that addressed reapportionment.
The "one man, one vote" rule (also called "one person, one vote") derives from the US Supreme Court ruling in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) that held state political districts of unequal size resulted in under-representation of some citizens' interests and over-representation of others'. This was considered "unrepublican," per Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, and also unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In order to meet constitutional standards, districts had to be reapportioned so each had approximately equal population.
Both Wesberry and Reynolds decisions were predicated on the landmark ruling in Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962), in which the US Supreme Court decided reapportionment of state legislative districts was not a "political question" that should be resolved through legislation. The Court found legislative conflicts of interest raised justiciable issues that could be addressed and resolved by the Federal courts.
Case Citation:
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964)
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoUnequal representation. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoOne person one vote, equal representation
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoRural Overrepresation
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Emmett Till's court case a supreme court case?
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
Who won in the Rhodes v Chapman supreme court case?
chapman won the supreme court case
What does the supreme court case us v bagley do?
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
The Supreme Court must have a to render a decision in a case?
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
After state supreme court what is next?
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
Who was Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court for the Wesberry v Sanders case?
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964)Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969) presided over Wesberry v. Sanders, (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Westbury v Sanders?
US Supreme Court decision of 1964 dealing with apportionment of Congressional districts. After a suit against Georgia's apportionment statute was dismissed by the federal circuit court, the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that all Congressional districts must be equal in size of voting population. The Georgia statute was declared invalid because its unequal apportionment gave greater voting power to residents of certain districts. source: <a href="http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Westberry+v.+Sanders">Wesberry v. Sanders</a>
How were the congressional districts drawn before Wesberry v Sanders?
Before the landmark Supreme Court case Wesberry v. Sanders in 1964, congressional districts in many states were drawn without much regard for equal population representation. Instead, districts were often drawn based on political considerations and gerrymandering tactics, allowing for unequal representation and potentially disenfranchising some voters. Wesberry v. Sanders established the principle of "one person, one vote," requiring that congressional districts be drawn to have roughly equal populations to ensure more equitable representation.
Was redistricting after a census declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1964?
Redistricting was not declared unconstitutional in the 1963 case Gray v. Sanders. It was after that.
Was Emmett Till's court case a supreme court case?
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
How does a case on appeal reach a supreme court?
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
Who won in the Rhodes v Chapman supreme court case?
chapman won the supreme court case
Who decide whether or not the Supreme Court will review case?
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
What does the supreme court case us v bagley do?
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
What Supreme Court case set up the Supreme Court?
There is no case that set up the Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court was required under Article III of the Constitution; Congress created it with the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Which court hears the case if a case involves the constitution?
supreme court
When a case goes directly to the US Supreme Court it is called what?
If the US Supreme Court is the first to hear a case, the Court has original jurisdiction.
