Kent v US 1966 is a famous court case involving juveniles and their rights. The decision and outcome of the case included the facts that:
1) there must always be a hearing in the matter of waiver of jurisdiction
2) there must always be assistance of counsel in a hearing of waiver of jurisdiction
3) the plaintiff's counsel must have access to all social records
If the judge determines that a waiver of transfer is the right answer there must be a statement of facts based on a full investigation, including a statement of the judge's reasons for the waiver.
A waiver of jurisdiction is basically the decision to allow a juvenile to be tried as an adult in criminal court.
Chat with our AI personalities
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
No. The US Supreme Court is the final court of appeal; if they deny your case, the decision of the lower court stands. There is no other avenue of appeal.
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
Generally, the US Supreme Court will hear a case from US District Court on direct or expedited appeal if:The case is of such national or constitutional importance it would clearly be appealed to and accepted by the Supreme Court anyway; orThe case involves legislation in which Congress specified appeals of District Court decisions must go directly to the Supreme Court (bypassing the Circuit Court).
The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the US. Each state has its own Supreme Court, but the US Supreme Court is the end of the line.