answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

to keep slavery out of any lands obtained from Mexico - apex :)))

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the aim of the Wilmot Proviso apex?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a proposed law that prohibited slavery in any lands won from Mexico?

wilmot proviso


What was the unstated goal of the Wilmot Proviso?

What was the unstated goal of the Wilmot Proviso?


How did southerners react to the wilmot proviso?

Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso. This is because the Wilmot Proviso established peace with Mexico, and the land that Mexico owned was in the South.


What was the aim of the Wilmer proviso?

The aim of the Wilmot Proviso was to prohibit slavery in any territory gained from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It was intended to prevent the expansion of slavery into these newly acquired territories.


What best is the best description of the wilmot proviso?

Wilmot's Proviso brought the future of slavery to everyone.


What called for a ban on slavery in any territory that the United States acquired from the war with Mexico?

The Wilmot Proviso qualifies as such. It however, was one of the leading causes of the American Civil War (1861-1865)


What plan specified that slavery should be prohibited in any lands that might acquired from Mexico?

The Wilmot Proviso (1846) prohibited slavery on any land acquired from Mexico.


Why did the South perceive the Wilmot Proviso as such a threat?

Because the Wilmot Proviso sought to halt the extension of slavery in the western territories


Who was the Wilmot Proviso named for?

Congressman Wilmot of Pennsylvanis who introduced the bill.


What was the name of the proposal david wilmot introduced in 1846?

The wilmot proviso


Who protested the Wilmot Proviso?

Southerners.


Why did slaveholders claim the wilmot proviso was unconstitutional?

Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution