answersLogoWhite

0

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

The US Supreme Court held that indigent defendants in criminal cases have a Sixth Amendment right to court-appointed counsel. It pretty much was the cause of the establishment of the Public Defender system in American courts.

For more information, see Related Links and Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
More answers

The Sixth Amendment requires the states to provide defense attorneys to defendants accused of felonies if they cannot afford their own.

User Avatar

Dede

Lvl 3
4y ago
User Avatar

tell me the answer

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the ruling of the Gideon v. Wainwright case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What supreme court case incorporated the right to a speedy trial?

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)


What principle was established by the 1963 Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright?

Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.


How did the US Supreme Court incorporate part of the Bill of Rights to the States in Gideon v. Wainwright 1963?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark US Supreme Court case that incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. In this case, the Court ruled emphatically that indigent defendants were entitled to court-appointed lawyers at critical stages of prosecution, including arraignment and trial.An earlier case, Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45 (1932) had already extended that right to state defendants in capital (death penalty) cases, but the Supreme Court later allowed the states to exercise case-by-case discretion with regard to providing attorneys for other serious criminal offenses in Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455 (1942).For more information, see Related Questions, below.


How were the Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright cases similar?

Answer this question… Both cases resulted in expanded protections for people accused of crimes.


How long was each sentence served by Clarence Earl Gideon the Appellee of Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Clarence Earl Gideon served two years of a five year sentence for the original 1961 conviction of "breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny," a felony in the state of Florida. Gideon entered prison in August 1961 and was released in August 1963 after the US Supreme Court remanded the case for rehearing. The second jury deliberated only an hour before acquitting Gideon in his second trial.Gideon was a petty criminal who had spent most of the previous three decades in and out of Texas and Missouri state prisons on charges of burglary, stealing, larceny, petty theft and escape. He had also been incarcerated in federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for stealing unspecified government property.For more information, see Related Questions, below.