answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Supreme Court Ended A Recount In Florida That Had Stalled The Election

-Novanet

User Avatar

Cory Rohan

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Godfrey Smitham

Lvl 13
1y ago

The Supreme Court Ended A Recount In Florida That Had Stalled The Election

-Novanet

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Ole Champlin

Lvl 10
2y ago

The Supreme Court Ended A Recount In Florida That Had Stalled The Election

-Novanet

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

The Supreme Court Ended A Recount In Florida That Had Stalled The Election

-Novanet

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

bart

Lvl 2
3y ago

the supreme court ended a recount in florida that had stalled the election.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the significance of the Supreme Court decision bush v gore?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What was the result of Reagan's and Bush's appointment to the supreme court?

to make the supreme court more conservative


Was Bush v Gore a decision by the US Supreme Court to decide who would be President?

Yes and no. The 5-4 US Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000) didn't directly award the Presidential Election to George W. Bush, but the Court's decision to stop the manual ballot recount in Florida had that effect, and the justices knew it would have that effect because Bush was leading Gore in the State's popular election by a mere 537 votes when the case was appealed.The Supreme Court held a Florida Supreme Court recount of 70,000 disputed ballots violated the constitutional rights of Florida voters under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause because the counting method was arbitrary and inconsistent.When the US Supreme Court reversed the Florida Supreme Court, Bush was awarded Florida's 25 Electoral votes, giving him a total of 271 Electoral votes to Gore's 266, barely enough to put Bush in the White House.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Why was the 2000 Bush v. Gore Supreme Court decision so controversial?

It hindered the re-vote of the presidential election between the two. If the recount had been allowed Gore may have become our then president, instead of Bush. There were also other different significants that came out of this case.


What did the supreme court rule in bush v gore?

In Bush v Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), the United States Supreme Court, in a per curiam decision, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, the Court ruled that noalternative method could be established within the time limits set by the State of Florida. Three concurring justices also held that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.


Who was the first President to have the US Supreme Court intervene in his election?

President George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore,(2000).

Related questions

What was the first presidential election outcome that was appealed to the US Supreme Court?

The first US Presidential election that required US Supreme Court intervention was in 2000, when the Court was called upon to render a decision about Florida election procedure in the case Bush v. Gore, (2000).As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, Florida was forced to stop recounting ballots, resulting in George W. Bush winning the popular vote and all of Florida's electoral votes, awarding Bush the presidency.


What was the result of Reagan's and Bush's appointment to the supreme court?

to make the supreme court more conservative


What was the result of reagans and bush's appointment to the supreme court?

to make the supreme court more conservative


Was Bush v Gore a decision by the US Supreme Court to decide who would be President?

Yes and no. The 5-4 US Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000) didn't directly award the Presidential Election to George W. Bush, but the Court's decision to stop the manual ballot recount in Florida had that effect, and the justices knew it would have that effect because Bush was leading Gore in the State's popular election by a mere 537 votes when the case was appealed.The Supreme Court held a Florida Supreme Court recount of 70,000 disputed ballots violated the constitutional rights of Florida voters under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause because the counting method was arbitrary and inconsistent.When the US Supreme Court reversed the Florida Supreme Court, Bush was awarded Florida's 25 Electoral votes, giving him a total of 271 Electoral votes to Gore's 266, barely enough to put Bush in the White House.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Who made the decision that rewarded the presidency to George W. Bush in 2000?

U.S. Supreme Court


The supreme court found that George W Bush had overreached his power in what case?

Rasul v. Bush


Why was the 2000 Bush v. Gore Supreme Court decision so controversial?

It hindered the re-vote of the presidential election between the two. If the recount had been allowed Gore may have become our then president, instead of Bush. There were also other different significants that came out of this case.


George W Bush's victory in the presidental election of 2000 was finally decided by?

The U.S. Supreme CourtAnswerthe supreme court of americathe Supreme Court halted the recount in Florida


What did the supreme court rule in bush v gore?

In Bush v Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), the United States Supreme Court, in a per curiam decision, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, the Court ruled that noalternative method could be established within the time limits set by the State of Florida. Three concurring justices also held that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.


Was the denial of the votes significant enough to give election to bush jr?

Maybe. The Supreme Court found for Bush.


What president was elected by a decision of the supreme court?

The Supreme Court does not have the power to appoint a president. You are probably referring to the election of 2000 when a portion of the Supreme Court denied another recount in Florida where the election was close . Florida's votes went to George W. Bush and he needed them to win the election. Later recounts seemed to indicate that Bush won, but some still say the election was decided by the court. Or in 1876, a panel which included five Supreme Court Justices and 10 Congressmen ruled on the credentials of several electors and ruled all the disputes in favor of Rutherford Hayes, giving him the election. Both Bush and Hayes lost the popular vote.


Why were liberals upset with the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v Gore?

They believed that the Court's conservative majority ruled in favor of Bush because of his conservative views