answersLogoWhite

0

its either 1. a monarch has absolute power 2. the state of nature is a peaceful and harmonious 3. political authority should be shared by the monarch and representatives of the people 4. citizens have a right to revolt. not sure which one of those 4 though.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao
More answers

Hobbes believes that a strong ruler is necessary to maintain order in a society (the Leviathon). Rousseau in 'The Social Contract' gives an account of a civil society that generates good citizens through a democratic education.

When the society is first forming however, the people lack these qualities and so a "Lawgiver" steps into power to teach them. This dictatorial figure relinquishes power after his task is complete. As opposed to Hobbes's account where he remains in power forever.

Also both Hobbes and Rousseau are social contract theorists and so the consent of the governed is necessary to legitimize a political society. For Hobbes people merely consent to being ruled whereas Rousseau believes the 'general will' of the people should decide the structure of society.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

a state exists to serve the will of the people

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would Hobbes and Rousseau agreed with?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp