its either 1. a monarch has absolute power 2. the state of nature is a peaceful and harmonious 3. political authority should be shared by the monarch and representatives of the people 4. citizens have a right to revolt. not sure which one of those 4 though.
Hobbes believes that a strong ruler is necessary to maintain order in a society (the Leviathon). Rousseau in 'The Social Contract' gives an account of a civil society that generates good citizens through a democratic education.
When the society is first forming however, the people lack these qualities and so a "Lawgiver" steps into power to teach them. This dictatorial figure relinquishes power after his task is complete. As opposed to Hobbes's account where he remains in power forever.
Also both Hobbes and Rousseau are social contract theorists and so the consent of the governed is necessary to legitimize a political society. For Hobbes people merely consent to being ruled whereas Rousseau believes the 'general will' of the people should decide the structure of society.
a state exists to serve the will of the people
Hobbes, Locke Rousseau
jean jacque rousseau
Popular sovereignty arose from the Enlightenment teaching of Rousseau, Hobbes and Locke. It comes from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
According to Thomas Hobbes, the state of nature or life would be worthless if not protected by the state, while according to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the state of nature involves men driving towards self-preservation.
There were three men who are historically linked to social contract theory. They are Thomas Hobbes, john Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Both Hobbes and Locke were Englishmen.
Hobbes believed in a social contract that necessitated a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos. Rousseau, on the other hand, emphasized the importance of individual freedom and the idea of the general will, where decisions are made collectively for the common good. They both had differing views on the nature of human beings and the role of government in society.
Hobbes, Locke Rousseau
Hobbes believed that humans are naturally selfish and must submit to a strong central authority to maintain order, while Rousseau thought that humans are inherently good but corrupted by society, and advocated for a more egalitarian and harmonious way of living in a social contract.
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
Hobbes believed the state of nature to be a state of war and chaos, where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He saw the social contract as necessary to establish a sovereign authority to maintain order. Locke viewed the state of nature more positively, as a state of natural rights and freedom, and believed the social contract existed to protect these rights. Rousseau saw the state of nature as peaceful and harmonious, with the social contract as a means to protect individual liberties while promoting the common good.
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are two philosophers who would agree with the idea that the state exists to serve the will of the people. They both believed in the social contract theory, where individuals give up certain rights in exchange for the protection and support of a government that is based on the consent of the governed.
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau
Rousseau can be seen as both an optimist and a pessimist. While he believed in the innate goodness of human nature and the potential for individuals to live harmoniously in state of nature, he was also critical of society and its corrupting influence on individuals. Rousseau's philosophical works often reflected a mix of optimism about human potential and pessimism about the state of civilization.
Locke, Harrington, Hobbes, and Rousseau all likely agreed on the importance of establishing a social contract as the foundation for political authority. They believed that individuals must consent to be governed in order for a just and legitimate government to exist. Additionally, they all emphasized the natural rights of individuals and the need to protect those rights through the structure of government.
Hobbes advocated the idea of a strong government which all citizens agreed to obey. Without an agreed upon ruler, according to Hobbes, society would descend into violence and chaos.
jean jacque rousseau