why, what does it matter. people have the freedom to join and/or represent any party without fear of persecution. in this country its ok to call a German a kraut or a french man a frog, but not a Pakistani a paki. the racists are not in the BNP it seems.
Chat with our AI personalities
To some degree they do. Party members almost always have the same views on many issues, so voters can at least infer some of the views a candidate holds. You have to be careful, though, just because someone belongs to a certain party does not necessarily mean that the person holds all of the same views as the party. You have to find out what the views of the individual candidates are regardless of the party they are in.
The Democratic-Republican Party didn't die, in the sense that they simply faded as the Federalists had; they actively split the party into two new parties (National Republicans and Democrats) after the Presidential election of 1824 because of major ideological differences that became intolerable to members of the Democratic-Republicans. Some became National Republicans, who were similar to the earlier Democratic-Republican Party, and some became Democrats, who shared more in common with the old Federalist party.
because he was decided or commited to goodness and he realized the british had no desire to find truth but americadid.
As far as I'm concern, "King Caucus" in politics refers to the process taken to choose a candidate for each party for the national party convention. The origin of this name it is because of the undemocratic choice of the candidate; however you can find more information in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_nominating_caucus or in the Encyclopaedia Britannica: http://www.britannica.com/presidents/article-231545 I hope this can help you! Bye
Central Australia, near Uluruu, in the Northern Territory and South Australia