The ancient Romans did not have three branches of government. Their government could be loosely divided into two branches, the Senate and the Roman People. SPQR. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial are an American innovation.
In theory no, in practice, yes. Every emperor including Augustus, had advisers and intimates who consulted and helped with the rule. According to Syme, Augustus had Agrippa, Maecenas and Livia as part of his ruling counsel, which constituted an oligarchy.
There have never any governments in which only one person can serve. One person cannot possibly run a whole government by him/herself. During the 244-year period of the Roman monarchy the government was headed by a king who had government officials who served as his subordinates. During the 482-year period of the Roman republic the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the republic and there were four other types of elected officers of state, who also served in the government (the censors, the praetors, the aediles and the quaestors). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and appointed the officials who served in their governemnts
Could be sudatorium
They had the power to declare war, make peace, nd make treaties. it could also coin and barrow money, create post offices, admit new states, and create an army and navy. They had the power to declare war, make peace, nd make treaties. it could also coin and barrow money, create post offices, admit new states, and create an army and navy.
In ancient Rome whether to declare war or not was debated in the senate. The issue was then referred to the Assembly of the Soldiers, which voted on war and peace.
assemblies
If they did, they would have a civil way
The government could not tax or declare war.
Congress could not negotiate with foreign powers
make treaties
Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.
They could not vote or hold government office.
No, it wasn't successful. The government never did declare it a war and didn't put in all that it could have to win.
The ancient Romans did not have three branches of government. Their government could be loosely divided into two branches, the Senate and the Roman People. SPQR. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial are an American innovation.
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
Trade: They could make thing out of what they traded. Government: 1: The government kept all the empire together 2:The government had many minds and could make different decisions.