0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the three branches of roman government?
The ancient Romans did not have three branches of government. Their government could be loosely divided into two branches, the Senate and the Roman People. SPQR. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial are an American innovation.
Did Rome have an oligarchy?
In theory no, in practice, yes. Every emperor including Augustus, had advisers and intimates who consulted and helped with the rule. According to Syme, Augustus had Agrippa, Maecenas and Livia as part of his ruling counsel, which constituted an oligarchy.
Who was the only person who could serve in the roman government?
There have never any governments in which only one person can serve. One person cannot possibly run a whole government by him/herself. During the 244-year period of the Roman monarchy the government was headed by a king who had government officials who served as his subordinates. During the 482-year period of the Roman republic the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the republic and there were four other types of elected officers of state, who also served in the government (the censors, the praetors, the aediles and the quaestors). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and appointed the officials who served in their governemnts
Vaulted area in roman baths?
Could be sudatorium
Why did Ferdinand marcos declare martial law?
because of the price hike of the gasoline in libya
What roman government body could declare was or negotiate peace terms?
In ancient Rome whether to declare war or not was debated in the senate. The issue was then referred to the Assembly of the Soldiers, which voted on war and peace.
This body could declare war or negotiate peace terms?
assemblies
Could a kingdom in the holy roman empire declare war on another territory in the holy roman empire?
If they did, they would have a civil way
What went wrong under the Articles of Confederation?
The government could not tax or declare war.
All what made the national government weak under The Articles of Confederation?
Congress could not negotiate with foreign powers
Under the Articles of Confederation only the national government could?
make treaties
That Julius Caesar was right to declare himself dictator of rome?
Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.
Why were unhappy with the government of the Early Roman Republic?
They could not vote or hold government office.
Was the US successful in their Vietnam campaign Why or why not?
No, it wasn't successful. The government never did declare it a war and didn't put in all that it could have to win.
What are the three branches of roman government?
The ancient Romans did not have three branches of government. Their government could be loosely divided into two branches, the Senate and the Roman People. SPQR. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial are an American innovation.
Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
Why did trade and government help success of roman empires?
Trade: They could make thing out of what they traded. Government: 1: The government kept all the empire together 2:The government had many minds and could make different decisions.
