Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights
Marbury vs. Madison
Palko v. Connecticut
Marbury v. Madison Hello Stupid are you Retarted
Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.
Judicial Review
One notable case that is correctly matched with the principle it established is Marbury v. Madison (1803), which established the principle of judicial review. This landmark decision affirmed the Supreme Court's authority to invalidate laws and executive actions that are contrary to the Constitution. It set a precedent for the role of the judiciary in ensuring that no law or government action can supersede constitutional principles.
The case that is correctly matched with its established principle is Miranda v. Arizona—suspected criminals must be read their rights before interrogation. This landmark decision led to the creation of the "Miranda Rights," ensuring that individuals in custody are aware of their rights to remain silent and to have legal counsel. In contrast, Brown v. Board of Education addressed racial segregation in public schools, ruling that "separate but equal" educational facilities were inherently unequal, thereby declaring segregation unconstitutional.
Marbury vs. MadisonJohn Marshall
Marbury vs. Madison
Palko v. Connecticut
In the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, the court established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
Marbury v. Madison Hello Stupid are you Retarted
Mapp vs. Ohio
The principle of judicial review was established in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall asserted the authority of the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional, thereby affirming the judiciary's role in interpreting the law. This decision laid the foundation for the system of checks and balances among the branches of government in the United States.
Brown V. Board of Education
Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.
Williams v. North Carolina