0
Verified answer
the fourteen amendment does not extend all Bill of Rights protections to the states
What principle of incorporation does the US Supreme Court use?
The US Supreme Court uses "Selective Incorporation" to apply individual clauses within the Bill of Rights to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses.Some historians hold that the 14th Amendment required states to adhere to the Bill of Rights, in toto, while others claim the individual amendments were designed to be incorporated selectively.Total or Mechanical Incorporation (sometimes also called complete incorporation), the method championed by Justice Hugo Black, would have used the Fourteenth Amendment to apply the entire Bill of Rights to the States at one time. The US Supreme Court has chosen to use "selective incorporation," however. The principle of selective incorporation upholds or rejects as inapplicable individual clauses within each Amendment when they are considered relevant to a case before the Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Which sentence in the excerpt supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain?
Which sentence in the excerpt supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain?
Why does writing a qualified claim make your claim stronger?
Because it acknowledges that your claim is debatable
What does incorporation mean as it relates to US government?
Incorporation means applying the US Constitution's Bill of Rights to the States to protect people's rights.The Bill of Rights originally regulated only the actions of the federal government, and did not apply to the states. Each state had its own constitution, and all state constitutions included a bill of rights, many of which mirrored the language of the US Constitution, and some of which afforded greater freedoms.In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Supreme Court often ruled in favor of state law when they were presented with cases that contradicted the first nine amendments (the 10th doesn't really confer any rights).After the Civil War, the US government decided it needed a way to enable Reconstruction and supplement the Civil Rights Act of 1866, so Congress created the 14th Amendment, ratified by the States in July 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment was written in a way that could have forced the States to uphold the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution, but the Supreme Court decided not interpret it that way.Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875 to prevent businesses from discriminating against people, but the US Supreme Court declared the Act unconstitutional. They held the Fourteenth Amendment didn't give Congress authority to regulate private entities.Some historians believe that the Fourteenth Amendment was meant to require States to follow the entire Bill of Rights (Total Incorporation), but others claim the individual Amendments were designed to be incorporated selectively. The Supreme Court has followed the doctrine of selective incorporation, upholding individual clauses within each Amendment only when they were relevant to cases before the Court and the justices thought the individual rights outweighed the states' rights.As of 2010, some parts of the Bill of Rights remain unincorporated, such as the Third, Seventh, one clause of the Fifth, and part of the Eighth. The Second Amendment (right to bear arms) was not incorporated to the States until June 2010. Prior to the Supreme Court decision in McDonald v City of Chicago,(2010) States had the right to make their own regulations about owning and using guns.
Why do presidential candidates claim to want to limit this growth but change when they take office?
Because there are certain rules and regulations the president must adhere to, and also congress must agree with him inorder to get anything done. And as we all know congress is about as compliant as a flaming bag of dog $h|t.
What principle of incorporation does the US Supreme Court use?
The US Supreme Court uses "Selective Incorporation" to apply individual clauses within the Bill of Rights to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses.Some historians hold that the 14th Amendment required states to adhere to the Bill of Rights, in toto, while others claim the individual amendments were designed to be incorporated selectively.Total or Mechanical Incorporation (sometimes also called complete incorporation), the method championed by Justice Hugo Black, would have used the Fourteenth Amendment to apply the entire Bill of Rights to the States at one time. The US Supreme Court has chosen to use "selective incorporation," however. The principle of selective incorporation upholds or rejects as inapplicable individual clauses within each Amendment when they are considered relevant to a case before the Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What supports the claim in a literary analysis?
The topic sentence supports the claim in a literary analysis.
What is an argumentative claim?
An argumentative claim is a statement that asserts a position on a debatable issue and presents a clear stance that the writer or speaker supports with evidence or reasoning. It provides the main point or thesis of an argument and aims to persuade the audience to agree with the author's viewpoint.
Which supports the claim in a leterary analysis?
topic sentence
Which sentence in the excerpt supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain?
Which sentence in the excerpt supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain?
What is the best defragment software?
Perfect disk, they even claim that it supports SSDs.
When writing a character analysis about death of a salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?
explain how your evidence supports your claim
Is FIFA corrupt?
yes There is strong evidence to suggest so. Andrew JENNINGS, a famous researcher on this topic supports this claim. There is a facebook group "FIFA Reformation" that also supports this claim. I certainly feel the political entity is corrupt.
When writing a character analysis essay about Death of a Salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?
explain how your evidence supports your claim
What is the basic structure of an argument?
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidence?
According to the claim it supports
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
