The Founding Fathers wanted to keep political pressure away from the Judicial Branch in order maintain the system of checks and balances. The system of government would only work if the judiciary was free from Legislative and Executive influence.
Local governments have a lot of branches. They have judicial (courts), executive (mayors), and legislative (board/council) branches just like the federal government, and then they have many departments that mirror the federal agencies. Many local governments will have a Power Authority or a Department of Transportation, which technically could be called executive as they implement regulations, but it's easiest to think of them as separate agencies responsible for a set of duties. Other agencies deal with public safety, social services, and education, so there's quite a variety. For more information on local government spending, revenue, and employment, check out http://www.govistics.com (state & county data is free).
A Judge is either appointed or voted in, and in some states both. A state judge gets his/her power from the governer of the state. or the people. A judge is not all that powerful if you think of it. He/she is only following and interpreting the laws that the people have set fourth through their legislature. A judge does not even enforce laws, that is done through the executive branch of Government. Our Government is based on the U.S. constitution. Think about it, if we the people decided that the Democracy is not working out for us, in theory, we could change it because we the people give the Government its power; however this would be extreamly difficult and everyone would have to agree or at least the majority would in order to change out system to something we think would be better.
== == One is the fact that the judicial branch needs the executive branch to enforce its decisions. As an example, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka, it took the President's ordering the National Guard out to make some states abide by the ruling. The Judicial Branch has no way to enforce its decisions without the executive's co-operation. Another is the fact that it is the executive branch that nominates the judges in the first place. As a practical matter, presidents nominate persons who share the same political beliefs they do. This has the effect of creating (or trying to create) a judicial branch that will interpret the Constitution the way that that president would like. Trouble is, once a Supreme Court Justice is confirmed, nothing can be done to force him or her to rule in a particular way. They are appointed with lifetime tenure on good behavior and their salaries cannot be diminished while they are in office. And as to salaries, nothing says a president has to include raises for them in any budget he proposes.
It belongs to the Legislative Branch !!!
The branch of government that is appointed for four years is the executive branch. In the United States, the President is elected to a four-year term and is the head of the executive branch. The executive branch is responsible for enforcing laws, managing the government, and overseeing foreign policy.
executive branch
The executive branch can set a person free held by the FBI. The President can use his power of pardon and reprieve granted by the Constitution.
Judicial branch. Specifically, the Supreme Court. Other judicial positions are still subject to political pressure.Especially elected judges.
The Government Printing Office, stylized today as GPO, is a division of the Legislative branch of the United States government. It services multiple branches, from the judicial to the executive, and currently maintains the Federal Digital System which provides government information to the general public free of charge.
It doesn't. The President heads that branch and the members of that branch serve at his or her pleasure. Feel free to tell the boss that you do not agree with their policy and turn in your resignation.
Based on the war between the former dictator of Iraq and Allied forces led by the USA & the UK, the new government of Iraq is no longer a dictatorship run organization. The government can be described as a parliamentary type with several balance of power meant authorities. Iraq holds free elections which is a dramatic change from 10 years ago. Iraq now has an executive branch, a legislative branch and a judicial branch.
The Founding Fathers wanted to keep political pressure away from the Judicial Branch in order maintain the system of checks and balances. The system of government would only work if the judiciary was free from Legislative and Executive influence.
to free all slaves
a system in which the government does not control how people conduct buisness
Oh honey, the Nigerian legislature is like the boss of laws in that country. They make laws, check the executive branch, and represent the people's interests. Basically, they're the ones calling the shots and keeping things in check.
Local governments have a lot of branches. They have judicial (courts), executive (mayors), and legislative (board/council) branches just like the federal government, and then they have many departments that mirror the federal agencies. Many local governments will have a Power Authority or a Department of Transportation, which technically could be called executive as they implement regulations, but it's easiest to think of them as separate agencies responsible for a set of duties. Other agencies deal with public safety, social services, and education, so there's quite a variety. For more information on local government spending, revenue, and employment, check out http://www.govistics.com (state & county data is free).