0
Which of these court rulings held that separate schools were unequal, and thus a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment?
cchloe
Brown vs the Board of Education established that school segregation is unconstitutional. The case was heard in 1954 in the United States Supreme Court, overturning the Fergueson case of the 1800's.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoBrown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
The full case name was Oliver Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. Et al. means "and others." The reason this case included "others" is that Oliver Brown was only one of 13 parents and 21 children suing the Topeka, Kansas, Board of Education for discrimination. By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, Brown had been consolidated with four other cases from different states alleging various 14th Amendment violations.
For more information on Brown v. Board of Education, see Related Links, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoBrown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
cchloe
Mendez v. Westminster
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoPlessey
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which supreme court decision is indicative of the court's rulings regarding the fourteenth amendment and state discretion in the decades after the civil war?
Plessy v. Ferguson
Which refers to a series of Supreme Court rulings that used the 14th Amendment to protect basic rights of citizens from state governments?
The Privileges or Immunities clause of the 14th Amendment was meant to protect citizens from violation of rights due to state interference. This Clause prevents discrimination against people from out of state in regards to basic rights. They mainly focus on a person's right to own a living.
Who enforces US Supreme Court rulings when they are against the President and the President refuses?
Whenever a U. S. President is in violation of the law as interpreted by the U. S. Supreme Court (or even if he/she is in violation of a law that the Supreme Court has not tested), it is the responsibility of Congress to impeach him/her.
Which action would most likely be protected under the First Amendment?
Making a public speech demanding that Congress impeach the president for corruption.
What kinds of rulings do appeals courts make?
The types of rulings are to uphold ,or keep the original decision made by the district court , reverse the district court's decision , or remand the case.
What the court rulings held that separate schools were unequal and thus a violation of the fourteenth amendment?
Mendez v. Westminster
Which supreme court decision is indicative of the court's rulings regarding the fourteenth amendment and state discretion in the decades after the civil war?
Plessy v. Ferguson
How does Chief Justice Earl Warren primarily support the Supreme Court's opinion?
With references to previous laws and rulings- apex!:)
Supreme court denied rulings in state affairs during what amendment?
It was the Fourteenth Amendment that the supreme court denied ruling in state affairs. You are welcome for a better answer that the last one. Maybe people can come to their sense sometimes.
Do you need a firearms permit under the 2nd amendment?
Technically, states are the entity administering the requirements surrounding the issuance and rulings/laws relating to firearms. The Second Amendment is a Federal constitutional instrument.
Which refers to a series of Supreme Court rulings that used the 14th Amendment to protect basic rights of citizens from state governments?
The Privileges or Immunities clause of the 14th Amendment was meant to protect citizens from violation of rights due to state interference. This Clause prevents discrimination against people from out of state in regards to basic rights. They mainly focus on a person's right to own a living.
What are the Major laws and rulings in the 1950's?
The most prominent laws and rulings of the 1950's dealt with integration and "Jim Crow" or "separate but equal". Laws concerning the mentally ill also came to the forefront.
Which refers to a series of supreme court rulings that used the 14th amendment to protect basic rights of citizens from state government?
the guarantees of freedom
Who enforces US Supreme Court rulings when they are against the President and the President refuses?
Whenever a U. S. President is in violation of the law as interpreted by the U. S. Supreme Court (or even if he/she is in violation of a law that the Supreme Court has not tested), it is the responsibility of Congress to impeach him/her.
What does the first amendment of the United States say?
Freedom of speech.
What supreme court decision legalized segregating?
A number of US Supreme Court cases upheld segregation in the years following ratification of the "Restoration Amendments" (Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth), which were intended to extend African-Americans civil rights. The three primary landmark cases included:The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 US 36 (1873)Held that Congress could not apply the Fourteenth Amendment to the States via the Privileges and Immunities Clause.Civil Rights Cases, 109 US 3 (1883)Invalidated the Civil Rights Act of 1875 as unconstitutional on the grounds Congress lacked the authority to enforce provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment against private citizens and businesses.Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)Upheld as constitutional the Louisiana Separate Car Act (Act 111), allowing the state to provide "separate but equal" facilities (specifically train cars, in this case) for African-Americans and whites.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is near vs Minnesota about?
It was "freedom of the press" issue. The US Supreme Court overturned two rulings by the Minnesota Supreme Court by ruling that the Public Nuisance Law of 1925 was unconstitutional, because it violated the Fourteenth Amendment. For these reasons we hold the statute, so far as it authorized the proceedings in this action under clause (b) [723] of section one, to be an infringement of the liberty of the press guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. We should add that this decision rests upon the operation and effect of the statute, without regard to the question of the truth of the charges contained in the particular periodical. The fact that the public officers named in this case, and those associated with the charges of official dereliction, may be deemed to be impeccable cannot affect the conclusion that the statute imposes an unconstitutional restraint upon publication.
