answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

the supreme court rules an act of congress unconstitutional, so congress proposes a constitutional amendment to overturn the decision

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Autumn Byrd

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 2y ago
yuh
User Avatar

Hello

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 1y ago
yuh
User Avatar

Laterius Williams

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 1y ago
pls stop putting the wrong answers on here
User Avatar

Ventispurr Dev

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 9mo ago
yuhh
More answers
User Avatar

Fallen Angel

Lvl 8
βˆ™ 2y ago

Congress overrides a presidential veto to make a new law, but the Supreme Court rules that the law is unconstitutional.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Shinha White

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 2y ago
The president vetoes

User Avatar

random dude

Lvl 5
βˆ™ 2y ago

The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

ymmrs

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 2y ago
That was right, thanks!
User Avatar

cxllin21

Lvl 1
βˆ™ 2y ago
this is correct

User Avatar

Ashleigh Akers

Lvl 4
βˆ™ 3y ago

The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote.

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Which scenario is not an example of one of the major ways media coverage shapes public opinion?

an online news site publishes a story that includes a link to a site where people can register to vote


Visual example of a Flow chart of 3 branches of government in the US?

Judicial Supreme Court checks laws


How do you use bicameral in a sentence?

Bicameral refers to a government that has two branches. For example: In many states, they have a bicameral legislature-- the House of Representatives and the state Senate.


How do checks and balances work in the government and give example?

One famous example happened just before the US Civil War. The US Congress the legislative branch passed a bill called the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The US president, the head of the executive branch signed the bill into law and as the executive branch does, it must enforce the law. Two branches of the Federal government used their powers to create this particular law. In 1857, the US Supreme Court, the judicial branch of the Federal government, exercised its power to check the other two branches by deciding the Act was unconstitutional. Here is an example of how two branches of government can be checked in balance by another one.


Which system gives each branch of government its own duties?

In general terms, nearly every governmental system gives particular duties to each branch of government within it. At the same time, 'constitutional' systems are rightly famous in respect to their careful delineation of distinct branches of government and the proper duties for each; for example, the American system provides very clear guidance on the duties for its judicial, legislative, and executive branches of government.

Related questions

which scenario is an accurate example of how branches of the federal government can check each other’s power?

The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)


What is one example of checks and balances found in article 2?

Branches of government


Which scenario is not an example of one of the major ways media coverage shapes public opinion?

an online news site publishes a story that includes a link to a site where people can register to vote


How can branches of government check other branches?

They can do things that limits the two other branches' powers. For example, if a President vetoes a bill, Congress can override it if they gets a 2/3 vote.


How would you explain tyranny?

When one individual is taking over a group. For example, the three branches of government


Which principle is the basis for forming a government with judicial legislate and executive branches?

The use of three different branches of government is an example of what is known as checks and balances. Each branch has some capacity to correct errors or abuses that are committed by the other two branches. Thus, the government becomes self correcting, at least in theory. (In practice, all 3 branches can be dysfunctional at the same time.)


Which principle is the basis for forming a government with judicial legislative executive branches?

The use of three different branches of government is an example of what is known as checks and balances. Each branch has some capacity to correct errors or abuses that are committed by the other two branches. Thus, the government becomes self correcting, at least in theory. (In practice, all 3 branches can be dysfunctional at the same time.)


How do you consider the relation of the 3 branches of government?

It's a relationship of checks and balances between the branches. For example if the Executive branch try's to pass a bill that is obscure and unconstitutional, the other two branches can shoot it down.


The US is an example of what government?

The United States is a Federal Republic with a democratic form of government and functions in three primary branches. The three branches are the Executive Branch (presidential), the Legislative Branch (House of Representatives and Senators elected to their position), and the Judicial Branch that has the Supreme Court as the highest court of law.


Visual example of a Flow chart of 3 branches of government in the US?

Judicial Supreme Court checks laws


What is the sepperation of powers?

That refers to the power in a government being held not by a single person or group, but by more than one - different branches of government. In modern democracies, there are often three branches of government - legislative, executive, and judicial.


What was the three part government of rome called?

Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.