answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Dred Scott v. Sanford*, 60 US 393 (1857)

In the Dred Scott decision, the Court held that slaves were chattel (property). Slaves, as well as people who had been slaves, or who descended from slaves, were not protected by the Constitution and could never be US citizens. Without citizenship status, African-Americans were denied access to the courts, and couldn't sue for their freedom, even if they had a contractual agreement granting them free status.

The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery, nullifying the Missouri Compromise.

The Court's decision in this case was overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery.

* The name Sanford is misspelled as "Sandford" in US Reports

Answer

That was the Dred Scott decision - concerning the status of a slave who had been taken on to free soil, and then back to slave country.

The Supreme Court declared that a black man should have no business suing a white man.

More ominously, it also ruled that slavery was protected by the Constitution. Taken literally, this would mean that there was no such thing as free soil.

These two aspects of the Supreme Court ruling helped to raise the temperature of the debate, and made war virtually inevitable.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Dred Scott v. Sanford*, 60 US 393 (1857)

In the Dred Scott decision, the Court held that people who had been slaves, or who descended from slaves, were not protected by the Constitution and could never be US citizens. Without citizenship status, African-Americans were denied access to the courts, and couldn't sue for their freedom, even if they had a contractual agreement granting them free status.

The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery, nullifying the Missouri Compromise.

The Court's decision in this case was overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery.

* The name Sanford is misspelled as Sandford in US Reports

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

In the famous Dred Scott decision, the US Supreme Court made some controversial declarations about slavery and property. The Court stated that slaves or freed slaves were not US Citizens and could not take a case to court. Because the US Constitution did not forbid slavery it was a "given" that slaves were "property" as sad as that seems.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The 1857 verdict on Dred Scott, a slave who had once lived on free soil, and wanted to claim his freedom retrospectively.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

It would help if you say what country you are talking about.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The Dred Scott case

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Dred scott v. sanford

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

dredd scott decision

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which supreme court case ruled that slaves were property?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which Supreme Court case ruled that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights?

Dred Scott v. Sandford


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


The supreme court has ruled that demonstrations on private property are?

illegal


What supreme court decision in effect meant that the constitution protected?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


Was Dred Scott v. Sanford overturned by the amending of the constitution?

Not amending. Interpreting. The Supreme Court ruled that when the Founding Fathers declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property.


What was the result of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision?

The Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision in 1857 ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and had no right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and stated that the federal government could not regulate slavery in the territories.


What US Supreme Court decision stated slaves were property and not citizens was later abolished by which constitutional amendment?

The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case affirmed that slaves were property. The court also ruled that Blacks could never be US Citizens. It took several Constitutional amendments to ensure that Blacks and other minorities had the same rights as white people. The 13th amendment abolished slavery totally.


The Supreme Court has ruled that states can require the owners of shopping centers to allow which activities on their property?

petitions


Why do you think the supreme court ruled that slaves were not citizens?

they though they were not good enough and they were just their servants and not citizens


What year was Dred Scott ruled a slave by the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.


What was the compromise of Dred Scott Decision?

It wasn't a compromise, it was a 7-2 decision. The controversy was over the reason given by the Supreme Court for rejecting Scott's application. They ruled that slaves were property, and a man's property was sacred under the Constitution. This meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.