The executive branch and the judicial branch came into conflict over the Indian Removal Act. Congress passed the act in 1830.
The federal government
The executive powers that most governors' posses are Appointment and Removal, Supervisory Powers, Budget-Making Powers, and Military Powers.Hope this helps :)
In the US, the most basic example of removal power is done by the electorate when they do not reelect a senator or member of the House of Representatives. The more severe type in the US is an impeachment a high level person, be it a Federal judge or even a president. The impeachment process in the federal government must be completed by a trial in the Senate. If convicted of the crimes committed the judge or even a president is removed from office.
Osceola's first act of defiance against the federal government's relocation plan occurred in 1835 when he refused to comply with the Treaty of Fort Gibson, which mandated the removal of the Seminole people from Florida to Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma. Instead of accepting the treaty, Osceola rallied his fellow Seminoles to resist the relocation, ultimately igniting the Second Seminole War. His leadership and refusal to surrender marked a significant stand against federal authority and the U.S. government's policies toward Native Americans.
The Seminole response to the Indian Removal Act was one of resistance and conflict. Many members of the tribe, led by leaders like Osceola, rejected the forced removal and chose to fight against U.S. government efforts to relocate them from their ancestral lands in Florida. This resistance culminated in the Second Seminole War (1835-1842), which became one of the most costly and prolonged conflicts in U.S. history. Ultimately, the Seminoles' determination to remain on their land led to a unique outcome, as some were able to evade removal and continue to inhabit parts of Florida.
The federal government did not enforce the court's decision.
The Government enforced the Indian removal act by threatening them. Those who didn't move willingly were forced out of their territory on "The Trail Of Tears"
Indian removal act
Indian removal act
when and where was the iroquois tribe confronted by removal or conflict with the United States?
The federal government
The federal government did not enforce the Court's decisions.
The executive powers that most governors' posses are Appointment and Removal, Supervisory Powers, Budget-Making Powers, and Military Powers.Hope this helps :)
The deadline for removal to federal court is typically within 30 days after the defendant receives the initial pleading that indicates the case is eligible for removal.
The removal of federal officials is called impeachment.
form_title=Tree Branch Removal form_header=Tree branch removal can be done to keep branches away from houses or power lines- or simply to help your trees stay healthy and beautiful. Do you want only dead branches removed?= () Yes () No Are you interested in tree topping?= () Yes () No () Maybe Do you want the chipped branches left for mulch?= () Yes () No
Worcester v. Georgia (1832) is significant to the Indian Removal Act because it established that the federal government, not individual states, had authority over Native American affairs. The Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's laws had no force within Cherokee territory, affirming the sovereignty of Native American nations. However, the ruling was largely ignored by President Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia, leading to the forced removal of the Cherokee and others, which culminated in the Trail of Tears. This case highlighted the conflict between federal authority and state interests in the context of Native American rights and land.