They argued that the new government would provide a better balance between the national government and state governments. Hope that helps!
Because ten they would be bossing around.
because the people argued that legalizing liquor under strict government controls would be easier to enforce then total prohibition. so finally the government chose to tax bad habits rather than forbid them
The detractors of the constitution listed a number of shortcomings in Federalist Papers (Number 85). They argued that the constitution would lead to the consolidation of power in the central government, that it would grant too much power to the president, and that it would allow the wealthy to unduly influence the government.
People that opposed the US Constitution argued in favor of the Bill of Rights. They felt the constitution itself would give all powers to the government officials and jeopardize the freedoms of the people. The Bill of Rights laid clear understanding that these rights and freedoms of the people could not be violated regardless of the actions of the government officials.
It is a James Madison quotation. 'If men were angels, no government would be necessary' 'If angels were to govern men, neither external or internal controls on government would be necessary'
If men were angels no one would do anything bad to hurt someone. So no government would be necessary.
James Madison
He meant that if people didnt do any crimes there would be no need to make laws and have a government.
Because if we were angles we would be ok to some degree. (bad pun there, you misspelt angels)Because if men were angels then we wouldn't be real and there would be no constitution.Because if men were angels we wouldn't need a government to control us as we'd be perfect and law abiding
They wanted a strong central government. Study Island. (;
The holy angels of God are perfect. They don't do anything wrong. So what the quote means is that if we were all angels, there would be no crime, and therefore no need for government, we'd all do just exactly what we should do. We would not need a government to rule us, because we'd be doing what we should without anyone human telling us what to do and not to do. The implication, in this answer is correct, as far as it goes. However, the initial premise, made by Madison, in the Federalist Papers #51, and stated in the above answer, is wrong. Angels, as originally created by GOD, were not perfect, not incapable of wrongdoing. Lucifer, was the highest angel, yet he committed (still committs) the highest sin. He attempted(s) to make himself equal with GOD. Angels were obviously given free will, to make choices, just as mankind, who the Bible states, is a "little lower than the angels." Hence, angels would not govern any better than man, as evidenced by the evil that came into the world, through Lucifer's choice, and the angels who followed him.
its necessary for a country to have a government because technically there would be no control
Charles Beard argued that the heart of government in the United States started at the municipal level. Charles Beard also argued that history would repeat itself if people were not of a mind to change.
Thomas Hobbes argued that an absolute monarchy was the most effective form of government. He believed that a powerful sovereign ruler was necessary to prevent the chaos and conflict that he believed would result from people's natural state of self-interest and competition.
An anarchist would support no form of government. An anarchist believes government is not necessary.
Montesquieu supported the idea of a social contract because he believed it was necessary to establish a balance of power between the government and the people. He argued that individuals would willingly give up some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and stability provided by the government. This concept helped shape his theory of the separation of powers in government.