answersLogoWhite

0

Rhode Island refused to send a delegate to the Philadelphia (or Constitutional) Convention in 1787. Patrick Henry, who would have been Rhode Island's delegate, was suspicious of the real purpose of the meeting and did not attend.

The decision was not made in opposition to the Constitution itself, because the US Constitution hadn't been proposed, let alone written, yet. The First Continental Congress had authorized the 1787 Convention to allow delegates address weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, but many people, like Patrick Henry, feared the proposed solutions would shift power away from the states and to the central government (which is exactly what happened).

Patrick Henry(apex)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
More answers

Not all of the Founding Fathers attended the Constitutional Convention. Most were simply unavailable or serving abroad. However, Patrick Henry chose to skip the Convention specifically to express his displeasure.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Patrick Henry

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Patrick Henry!

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who opposed the Constitutional Convention and did not attend?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp