It is your right!
To wit:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
That's from our Declaration of Independence.
Yes, I don't know what country you live in, but in the Declaration of Independence it states: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
no, the federal government is responsible for foreign affairs.
According to the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson among others, it is the citizen's civic duty to "alter or abolish" any oppressive form of government. Despite his historical standing as a revolutionary hero, as a lawyer and diplomat he was probably referring to political action and not violence.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them to absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
I am truly surprised you ask this question. Without the freedom of speech and press the government can not be stopped when it oversteppes its duty to the people. When the government does illegal things a viable press is needed. Watergate is the perfect example of the press uncovering what Nixon did. Protest is also a part of the freedom of speech and the ability to write, film, expose, and even sing about the government. When this is stifled the democracy can not function and it becomes a authoritarian government instead. Be careful of the government or president who tries to limit the freedom of speech.
Thoreau identified potential problems with government including unjust laws, lack of individual freedom, and the potential for government to become oppressive and infringe on citizens' rights. He believed that individuals had a moral duty to resist unjust laws and challenge the government when it acted against the interests of its citizens.
Thomas Jefferson
If a government becomes tyrannical, the duty of the people is to resist and challenge that authority, as it undermines their rights and freedoms. This can involve peaceful protest, civil disobedience, or, in extreme cases, armed resistance. Citizens should strive to unite, raise awareness, and seek to restore democratic principles while advocating for justice and accountability. Ultimately, the goal is to reclaim their rights and establish a government that serves the interests of the people.
they dontAdded: The police are part of the Executive Branch of government and have no part in passing laws. Law are enacted by the Legislative Branch of government and then it becomes the duty of the Executive Branch to carry them out.
"Fahrenheit 451" is a dystopian novel by Ray Bradbury that follows the story of Guy Montag, a fireman who burns books in a society where reading is forbidden. As Montag questions the society he lives in, he becomes increasingly disillusioned with the oppressive government and seeks out ways to preserve knowledge and fight against censorship. The novel explores themes of censorship, conformity, and the power of knowledge.
That it has not done enough to truly represent the people
Yes, I don't know what country you live in, but in the Declaration of Independence it states: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Men must dissolve the political bands connecting them when a government becomes destructive to their fundamental rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This typically occurs when a government fails to uphold its responsibilities or when it acts in ways that are oppressive or tyrannical. In such cases, it is not only their right but also their duty to seek a new governance that respects and protects their freedoms. Ultimately, this act of dissolution is a means of reclaiming agency and establishing a system that aligns with the will of the people.
slavery
Thomas Jefferson asserts that when a government becomes destructive of the people's rights, it is not only their right but their duty to alter or abolish that government. He emphasizes that the people should institute new governance that aligns with their safety and happiness. This principle is rooted in the belief that the government derives its power from the consent of the governed, and when it fails to uphold its responsibilities, the people must take action to restore their rights.
To explain why citizens have a moral obligation to disobey laws they find unjust
Thomas Paine wrote the crisis, and his purpose was to argue that Americans had a duty to revolt against Britain.