Best Answer


User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who was appointed to supreme court by Jackson he wrote the Dred Scott decision?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

What did Stonewall Jackson think of the Dred Scott Decision?

Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea

Which of these was not a result of the Dred Scott U.S. supreme court decision?

The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man

What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Where did the Dred Scott Decision occur?

In the Supreme Court.

Who was the subject of a supreme court decision on slavery?

Dred Scott

How did the north react to the dred Scott case decision?

That the Supreme Court decision was both unnecessary and invalid.

What did the supreme court in its decision in the dred Scott case?

The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(

What supreme court decision divided the nationall even more?

Dred Scott case

What supreme court decision overturned efforts to limit the spread of slavery?

dred scott

Roger B. Taney?

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court when Dred Scott decision was made

What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?

One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.

How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?

Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.