Thomas Jefferson hoped to reduce the influence of the Federalist party over the federal judiciary, and to shift the balance of the Supreme Court more toward his own Democratic-Republicans.
Chase was a logical target of Jefferson's ploy because the justice was, as Alexander Hamilton remarked, "universally despised." One reason the Jeffersonians disliked Chase was that he had switched his allegiance from the Democratic-Republican party to the Federalist party, and had become something of a zealot. Chase also had a prickly personality, and a tendency to make cutting remarks about his rivals.
Ostensibly, the eight Articles of Impeachment against the Supreme Court justice resulted from his alleged prejudicial treatment against John Fries, a member of Jefferson's party, when Chase was riding circuit. The Articles were recorded by the House, and reprinted in a book Chase co-wrote, Trial of Samuel Chase: an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States,By Samuel Chase, Samuel Harrison Smith, Thomas Lloyd, United States.
Summary of Charges
In consequence of which irregular conduct of the said Samuel Chase, as dangerous to our liberties, as it is novel to our laws and usages, the said John Fries was deprived of the right, secured to him by the eighth article amendatory of the constitution, and was condemned to death without having been heard by counsel, in his defense, to the disgrace of the character of the American bench, in manifest violation of law and justice, and in open contempt of the rights of juries, on which, ultimately, rest the liberty and safety of the American people.
Chat with our AI personalities
The failed impeachment attempt strengthened the concept of judicial independence, preserved the separation of powers, demonstrated the system of checks and balances was effective.
It also discouraged Supreme Court justices from becoming directly involved in partisan politics, and Congress from attempting to use impeachment as a political weapon in the absence of actions that could be legitimately considered "high crimes and misdemeanors."
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Supreme Court appointments are made for life, unless the Justice is impeached by the House of Representatives and successfully tried in the Senate. The President never has the option of replacing a Justice on a whim.The President may nominate a new Justice if a vacancy occurs on the Court while the President is in office; however, the only conditions under which this is possible is if a Justice dies in office, retires, resigns, becomes permanently incapacitated, or is impeached by the House and removed from office by a vote of the Senate.
Yes. US Supreme Court justices may be impeached by the House of Representatives and tried in the Senate, just like the President. The justice must have committed a serious breach of ethics or be accused of "high crimes and misdemeanors," a vague term that encompasses both criminal acts and various forms of judicial misconduct. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
A US president cannot hold two government positions at the same time, nor can any other federal government official. Only one former US President has gone on to serve on the Supreme Court: William Howard Taft was Chief Justice from 1921-1930.
John Marshall was the 45, not 44, year old distant cousin of Thomas Jefferson who was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and radically changed the job of the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court justices have lifetime appointments--most of them retire, but they can stay on the bench until they die like William Rehnquist did. They can be impeached, but that's the only way to get rid of one. The only justice to have ever been impeached was Samuel Chase, who was acquitted. Samuel Chase was nominated to the Court by George Washington.