The fundamental argument against Parliament's taxation was that since the colonies did not receive representation in Parliament, they should not be taxed. The colonists had lobbied for representation for years, without success. As a result, the sudden levying of taxes by Parliament was totally unexpected, and angered the colonists. Although the taxes levied differed, this was the fundamental argument for all of them, including the Stamp Act.
That the colonists felt as if its their duty to pay off the massive war debts for Great Britain by means of high taxes on ridiculous items.
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).
no taxation without representation....
the colonists revolted. "no taxation without representation"
"no taxation without representation" means that they dont want taxes without somebody to speak for them (the colonists)
Correct, they had no representation in government.
"No Taxation Without Representation!" was the phrase.
It was because of the unfair taxes and the Massacre which killed 5 colonists.
no taxation, without representation representation
"no taxation without representation" means that they dont want taxes without somebody to speak for them (the colonists)
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).
"No taxation without representation"
representation
Taxation without representation.
Virtual Representation was rejected by the colonists and their delegates when Parliament began taxing them without their consent - remember: "no taxation without representation"
No taxation without representation in parliament
Stamp act
No taxation without representation.