In order to satisfy the southern slave holding states on the issue of determining population for representation in the National Government. The northern non-slave holding state didn't want slaves to count as a whole person, or the population in the south would be too much. The southern states wanted the slaves to be counted. The compromise was the 5 slaves would count as 3 people. Answer The 3/5 Compromise was a political negotiation by the South to achieve more voting power in the national legislature. They used the (possibly real) threat of alliance with the British (the South liked the economic business they had with the British), as well as the threat that a country fractured between North and South would eventually succumb to one or more of the old empires (Britain, France and Spain) to achieve the 3/5 Compromise. These threats were used as leverage to achieve voting power in the legislature for slaves , of course these new votes would be cast in their masters' interest. The power of this "negro vote" is what put Thomas Jefferson in the White House and allowed the South to not merely continue, but expand slavery. He won in 1800 by only the margin created by the "negro vote". Garry Wills' book "Negro President: Thomas Jefferson and the Slave Power" (ISBN: 0618485376) gives great in-depth service to this topic. It's a great read! Answer As a point of clarification, the 3/5 compromise was never "added" to the U.S. Constitution. It was a Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution that came out of the "Dredd Scott" case. If you're going to provide an answer, or a "clarification", you have some responsibility to do at least a minimum amount of research, and not to make flatly false statements. Article I. Section. 2. Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. [...] Answer The 3/5 compromise was added so the Northern and Southern states could come to an agreement of how slaves were counted in the population. If all the slaves were counted, Southern states would gain more legislative power by means of more representatives. So, the 3/5 compromise was created so the slaves didn't count as a whole, and so the Northern states thought legislative power distribution was equal. Answer The 3/5 compromise was to distribute equal representation among the northern and southern states whereas the Dredd Scott case was concerning slave rights and freedom (He was moved to a free state and when he moved back sued because he was declared free) Answer A short, direct question deserves the same in a response. The 3/5 Compromise was added to the Constitution simply to settle an issue of "representation."
It was the process used to decide the number of representatives that could be elected to the House of Representatives by Southern states and the distribution of tax revenue. Each slave was counted as three-fifths of a person" rather than a whole individual in an attempt to keep Southern slave owners from gaining substantial power in government and financial advantage in the apportioning of taxes. also that some people can be such a b about f slaves
Henry Clay did NOT write the Three-Fifths compromise. In fact, at the time that the Three-Fifths compromise was accepted by the government in 1787, Clay was only about 10 years old. Not to mention that the Three-Fifths compromise was first proposed about four years before that, in 1783, when Clay was only about 6 years old.
The Compromise of 1790 led to the acceptance of Alexander Hamilton's plan for reducing the national debt. This compromise was the first big compromise reached by the new government in America.
The ability to interpret and amend the constitution represents a compromise because you need to give a little to get a little. You pay taxes and your kids go to good schools.
The Great Compromise is all the branches separated, the Exuecutive, the Judicial, and the Legislative. They all have their own jobs. The reason why they are separated is that they need to control or check each others power. They can't have too much.
this people are stupid they need to answer every question people asked.
valuing the need to compromise - Apex
The Founding Fathers included the Necessary and Proper Clause in the U.S. Constitution, to provide Congress with the ability to meet the needs of a changing country. The clause is found in Article One.
Examples with the word "compromise" and other variants: "You've comprised the mission." "Don't compromise the plan." "What we've done was a compromise between the two of us." "We need to learn how to compromise." "He won't compromise his morals." "Despite her hatred of him, she agreed to compromise." "The oversight caused a compromise of the machine."
there are three compromises in the constitution
to be a founding citizen on smallworlds ;you need to be a citizen since 2008 beta ; if you are a founding citizen you may have received a free beta cape which only founding citizens can get unless it is sold separately
Environmental health
The compromise was known as the Connecticut Compromise. They reached this compromise by the delegates debating and then they came up with a legislature with two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is all about my homework ! lol ! i need help too !
no
because something broke it
I'm trying to find out the same thing but what I think, is that James Madison was a key part in the founding of the US and is now known as the father of the Constitution. Good luck with whatever you need. :)
A compromise was reached between the two parties after a lengthy negotiation. In a healthy relationship, both partners must be willing to compromise. The committee had to compromise on some key issues to finalize the project plan.
The need to find a fair solution.
win, lose, compromise