It makes sense that a Supreme Court decision is not permanently binding because the Court's interpretations of the law can evolve over time as societal values and norms change. Allowing for the possibility of revisiting and potentially overturning past decisions ensures that the law remains responsive to the needs of society and reflects current understanding and perspectives. Additionally, the principle of stare decisis, which guides the Court to respect precedent, is balanced with the recognition that legal interpretations may need to adapt to new circumstances.
A decision made by a higher court sets a binding precedent for the inferior court(s).
In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
Supreme Court
Not necessarily. The US Supreme Court sometimes issues per curiam opinions that are binding (on the instant case) but unsigned; however, these decisions do not set precedent for future cases.
A decision made by a higher court sets a binding precedent for the inferior court(s).
In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.
Technically no, because all states have autonomous jurisdiction. A US District Court decision is persuasive authority over a state court. A US District Court is a federal court, not a state court. A state supreme court decision however, is binding authority on a state appeals court level, and a trial court decision in that state would still be persuasive because its from a lower court. The decision from the Virginia Court of Appeals, however, becomes a binding authority over the state court.
The decision of the court is ALWAYS binding on everyone, unless it is appealed to a higher court which may overturn the decision.
No. The decisions of the Texas Supreme Court are binding on trial courts in Texas. That is why it is called the Supreme Court.
A Supreme Court decision can be overturned by a constitutional amendment, a new Supreme Court decision, or a change in the composition of the Court.
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
When the Supreme Court refuses to hear an appeal for a case, it means that they have denied the request for review. This denial does not establish any legal binding or precedent, and the decision of the lower court stands. The denial by the Supreme Court does not provide an explanation or indicate agreement with the lower court's decision.
The lower court decision from the highest court that reviewed the case becomes final and legally binding.
All court decisions are binding unless overturned by a higher court.
No
Yes, you can appeal a Supreme Court decision to a higher court, such as the United States Court of Appeals.