The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military
Military rule represents a failure to make civil rule work.
Civil rule can look ineffectual, but it is actually a triumph of civilization to have an army reporting to an elected civilian assembly.
Military governments look efficient, but they usually conceal terrible inefficiency and corruption behind the uniforms and medals.
The meaning of Civil Protection is an effort to protect civilians and citizens of a city from military attack. This means that the military tries to keep war efforts focused on themselves rather than civilian cities.
Ensuring that the US military was larger than the Soviet military
The Allies, easily. The number of military deaths on the part of the Soviet Union (8 million +) and China (3.8 million) were horrendous and account for the high overall numbers on the Allied side.
ny fighting most people think that their powers are better than anyone actually, the power of a power rule says that when a power is placed to an exponent we multiply the two exponents together to come to an answer it's very simple to understand
which colonists? Ifyou mean America, it's because of hefty taxes on basic goods and because they felt they'd do better as an independent state than with British rule.
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
there are more rules in military than civilian
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
cilivian rule is better than military because cilivian are more civilized than the military they are more peaceful than military
Usually it isn't. Behind the outward show of efficiency, military systems are too inflexible to operate smoothly, and many highly sinister types can be found hiding behind the raiment of respectability. Only when a country is descending into violent mob-rule or rotten with corruption do you have to send for the military. It's a pretty desperate cry for help.
the answer is simple its not even better than civilian rule why do you think that the civilian governors are the ones ruling us now because nobody wanted military governors
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
military rule is better than civillian regime
I would say not really. But the bad democracy can progress where as the military rule will most likely become a terrible dictatorship and the democracy would (obviously) be better. This is my opinion.
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.