Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThat is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoAnonymous
iuytrfghj
They both have the right to make bills
Compare and contrast the three branches of the Arizona state government with the three branches of the federal government.
Democratic
parliament less power compare to executive
promissory note
Why might a Roman historian like Ammianus want to compare the Huns to “unthinking animals”?
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
Read the account of the battle in the account by historian Herodotos to compare it.
there r thins on the plants here like jerms
Yes.
I bieleve it is the they compare animals by the texonimy theary.... Sorry if I got it wrong.... And sorry for not having many details...
Raised germ free
No.
They r both animals
to known species
both are animals!:)
do not know