0
Why might a roman historian like Ammianus want to compare the Huns to unthinking animals?
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
What else can I help you with?
How can you Compare and contrast the US Constitution and state constitutions?
They both have the right to make bills
What type of political system do people compare with the Internet?
Democratic
What is Executive Supremacy?
parliament less power compare to executive
Compare and contrast the three branches of the Arizona state government with the three branches of the federal?
Compare and contrast the three branches of the Arizona state government with the three branches of the federal government.
What does Dr King compare the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence to?
promissory note
Why might a roman historian like ammiamus want to compare the Huns to unthinking animals?
A Roman historian like Ammianus Marcellinus might compare the Huns to unthinking animals to emphasize their perceived barbarism and savagery, contrasting them with the more "civilized" Roman culture. This comparison could serve to dehumanize the Huns, making their violent actions seem more instinctual and less rational, thereby justifying Roman fears and hostilities towards them. Additionally, such imagery would resonate with Roman audiences, reinforcing their cultural superiority and the need for military vigilance against perceived threats.
Why might a roman historian like ammianus want to compare the Hun's to unthinking animals?
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
What does marcellinus mean when he describes the Huns as being glued to their horses?
When Marcellinus describes the Huns as being "glued to their horses," he is emphasizing their exceptional skill and familiarity with horseback riding. This phrase suggests that the Huns were highly adept at riding horses and had a strong bond with their animals, indicating a deep connection and reliance on their equestrian abilities for mobility and warfare. The image evoked is one of seamless coordination and unity between the Huns and their horses, highlighting their prowess as mounted warriors.
How do plants and animals in Switzerland compare to the plants and animals compare to California?
there r thins on the plants here like jerms
The historical accuracy of 300 compared to the battle of thermopylae?
Read the account of the battle in the account by historian Herodotos to compare it.
Can you compare humans to animals?
Yes.
How do scientists compare different animals?
I bieleve it is the they compare animals by the texonimy theary.... Sorry if I got it wrong.... And sorry for not having many details...
Scientists compare gnotobiotic animals with regular animals What makes gnotobiotic animals different?
Raised germ free
Compare mammals and fish?
They r both animals
Can you compare the reproductive capacity of a starfish with that of other animals?
No.
Why would a guy compare himself to a walrus?
both are animals!:)
Where did Darwin compare the islands plants and animals?
to known species
