answersLogoWhite

0

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
More answers

No I don't believe that freedom of expression should be limited. The moment it is there is a problem and the government has no right to do it. One of the factors that keeps a democracy viable is the ability of a free press and free expression to monitor the political atmosphere and the people in office. Without a free press Nixon would have gotten away with the Watergate break in and his dirty tricks.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

it should be limited if it is harmful to the common good or to your surrounding citizens.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

No, not really. You can't yell fire when there isn't one or send a threat to someone.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
User Avatar

yes there are

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why should the freedom of expression be limited?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp